Whītau School
Contributing · State
- Year levels
- 1–6
- Total roll
- 296
- Enrolment zone
- Yes
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 221 Woodham Road, Linwood, Christchurch
- Territorial authority
- Christchurch City
- Phone
- 03-3898112
- office@whitau.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Christchurch · schools in Canterbury
Can my child go here?
This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work
Loading zone map…
Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.
Check if your address is in zone →
Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 172
- Māori
- 111
- Pacific
- 84
- Asian
- 40
- MELAA
- 17
- Other
- 5
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 17 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 44 |
| Year 02 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 61 |
| Year 03 | 18 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 49 |
| Year 04 | 17 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 40 |
| Year 05 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 51 |
| Year 06 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 65 |
| Year 07 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Total | 115 | 101 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 178 | 0 | 319 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 17 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 45 |
| Age 06 | 19 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 60 |
| Age 07 | 18 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 48 |
| Age 08 | 18 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 43 |
| Age 09 | 24 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 48 |
| Age 10 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 64 |
| Age 11 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Total | 115 | 101 | 39 | 19 | 0 | 178 | 0 | 319 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
611.6%
| Whītau School | 611.6% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 38.3% |
| Contributing | 35.6% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 123% |
|---|---|
| Male | 965.6% |
| Māori | 1037.1% |
| Pacific | 278% |
| Asian | 73.9% |
| Other | 568.7% |
| European/Pākehā | 525% |
| Total | 611.6% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
16.5%
| Whītau School | 16.5% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 3.7% |
| Contributing | 3.5% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 28.2% |
| Māori | 46.2% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 16.5% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Whītau School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 1.7% |
| Contributing | 1.5% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 513
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Major urban area
- Date opened
- 2 August 1908
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 3
- Last reviewed
- 7 June 2024
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (7 June 2024)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The board assurance report of 7 June 2024 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.
The roll ERO recorded, and when
ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 296 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.
September 2019
312
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 6 November 2019
This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 7 June 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Whītau School is situated in the east of Christchurch and provides education for students in Years 1 to 6. The school endeavours to develop citizens of the future, who are lifelong learners, show respect and responsibility for themselves, for others and for the environment. They celebrate being a connected and culturally diverse learning community who value authentic learning relationships.
There are two parts to this report.
Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.
Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
The school is working towards equitable and excellent outcomes for all students.
Less than half of all students achieve at or above curriculum expectations in writing and reading. A small majority of students achieve at or above expectations in mathematics. Māori students achieve at a similar level to their peers.
The school continues to focus on improving attendance and outcomes for groups of students and reducing inequities.
There is an effective range of internal and external pastoral care for wellbeing supports being utilised.
Conditions to support learner success
Leaders effectively analyse student outcomes and use this information to inform strategic priorities and the professional learning and development of teachers.
Coherent professional growth cycles enable identification of teachers’ professional learning and development needs.
Leaders ensure effective guidelines support cohesion and consistency in teaching and learning across the school.
School board and leaders engage in robust conversations about student progress and achievement in order to set new strategic priorities and to impact positively on student outcomes.
Improved use of student progress and achievement information is strengthening teaching and learning.
Teachers successfully track and monitor student progress and achievement in order to design appropriate interventions and impact positively on students at risk of not achieving.
A suitable range of assessment tools and planned use of moderation ensures reliable and valid data on students’ progress and achievement is used to inform next steps in teaching and learning.
Strong culture of collegial coaching and critical reflection guides teacher growth in capability.
Organisational conditions effectively support a strong focus on improving outcomes for learners.
Student identities and whānau and community knowledge, language and culture are represented in curriculum materials and the enacted curriculum.
Staff are supported by the board to increase understanding and use of culturally responsive practices.
Students’ progress and achievement data is used to identify the impact of initiatives on improving outcomes for learners.
Part B: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
accelerate the progress and achievement of all students in reading and writing and reduce disparity for groups within the school
continue to improve the percentage of students attending school regularly
strengthen the use of te reo Māori, tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori throughout the school curriculum
reduce disparity for Pacific learners by enhancing understanding and responding to their needs.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows:
Within three months:
schoolwide teacher professional development in literacy, especially writing
increasing teachers’ capability to integrate te reo Māori, tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori within the curriculum and their teaching and learning
daily analysing, monitoring and supporting of student attendance to increase regular attendance at school
leaders participate in Tautai o le Moana professional development and develop an implementation plan
Every six months:
professional growth cycle processes support improved teacher capability and implementation of literacy and te ao Māori in schoolwide teaching and learning
schoolwide student progress and achievement data is collated, analysed, used to inform teaching and learning and is reported to the community
Annually:
strategic priorities are tracked and monitored to identify progress to achieving current goals and future priorities
school improvement in te reo Māori is analysed using the Poutama Reo indicators
a reflective, evaluative process is used by teachers to provide evidence on the impact of their teaching practice as part of their professional growth cycle.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
improved student attendance and outcomes in reading and writing
teachers’ te ao Māori content knowledge strengthened to adapt and refine their programmes and practices to meet the needs of all students in their classrooms
increased equity in learning outcomes between groups of students especially for Pacific learners.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Shelley Booysen Director of Schools
7 June 2024
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 3 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).