KuraHub

← Back to search

Waitotara School

Full Primary · State

Year levels
1–8
Total roll
41
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 94 schools in Taranaki Region with a published location. Waitotara School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
Severn Street, Waitotara
Territorial authority
South Taranaki District
Phone
06-3465957
Email
office@waitotara.school.nz
Website
http://www.waitotara.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Taranaki

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

Uniform
  • RequiredSchool uniform is compulsory Monday to Thursday.  Students may wear mufti on Fridays.

Check it on the school’s own website →

What does the school say about itself?

Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

In their words
    • OUR MISSION
    • A supportive environment where students will achieve the skills and attitudes needed to be a confident learner in the 21st century.
    • OUR VALUES
    • We encourage Waitotara school students to show DRIVE values :
    • Determination, Respect, Initiative, Virtue, Empathy.

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
32
Māori
11
Pacific
1
Asian
0
MELAA
0
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0120000406
Year 0220000103
Year 0310000607
Year 0410000506
Year 0500000303
Year 0620000507
Year 0710000203
Year 0800000101
Total9000027036
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 0520000406
Age 0620000103
Age 0710000607
Age 0810000506
Age 0900000303
Age 1020000507
Age 1100000202
Age 1210000102
Total9000027036

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Waitotara School0%
Taranaki Region41.7%
Full Primary35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
PacificNot available (source marker: "nd")
AsianNot available (source marker: "nd")
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Waitotara School0%
Taranaki Region4.1%
Full Primary3.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
PacificNot available (source marker: "nd")
AsianNot available (source marker: "nd")
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Waitotara School0%
Taranaki Region1.6%
Full Primary1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
PacificNot available (source marker: "nd")
AsianNot available (source marker: "nd")
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
496
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Rural settlement
Date opened
2 April 1876

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
5
Last reviewed
27 September 2024
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (27 September 2024)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 27 September 2024 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 41 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. February 2017

    16

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 6 April 2017

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 27 September 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Waitotara School is a full primary located in South Taranaki providing education for students in Years 1 to 8. The school seeks to achieve connected and confident communicators, collaborators, self-managers and thinkers, that show resilience and drive their own learning.

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the October 2022 ERO report, the school has focused on evaluating how well delivery of the school’s literacy curriculum achieves equity and excellence for learners.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

Embedded assessment processes and practices that support effective teaching, learning, and reporting.

Assessment tools have been revised and reflect new approaches to literacy providing relevant information which informs teaching and learning.

Written reports have been updated to reflect changes to literacy assessment providing appropriate information to parents and whānau on their child’s progress.

Effective teacher practice, reflective of their participation in professional learning and development (PLD), aligned to agreed expectations for delivery of the school’s literacy curriculum.

Involvement in structured literacy PLD has strengthened the collective capability and capacity of staff to deliver clearly sequenced teaching and learning matched to the specific needs of learners.

Other Findings

The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s action is the impact for learners through the development of structured approaches to literacy. Implementation has strengthened teachers’ ability to consistently sequence literacy learning and ensure any identified knowledge gaps are addressed.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Learners progress well over time with outcomes increasingly equitable and excellent outcomes.

The majority of learners achieve at or above curriculum expectations in mathematics and reading, with slightly over half achieving in writing; raising writing achievement is a priority for the school to address, particularly for boys.

Conditions for learning are highly inclusive; learners’ sense of wellbeing is affirmed through positive interactions between staff, students and the community.

Regular communication with parents and whānau has impacted positively, increasing rates of attendance for learners; most students attend school regularly meeting the Ministry of Education targets.

Conditions to support learner success

Inclusive leadership actively involves students, parents and whānau in development, implementation and evaluation of the school curriculum, promoting a collective response to the needs of learners.

Leaders systematically use evaluative evidence to ensure identified actions for improvement that strengthen outcomes for learners.

Leaders suitably align teacher professional learning goals and practice discussions to relevant priorities, informing a collective response that meets the needs of learners.

The principal, staff and trustees work in partnership with parents, whānau, iwi and the community to foster a culture committed to achieving their identified priorities.

Curriculum and teaching practices are increasingly responsive to learners’ needs and interests.

Teachers access a range of appropriate resources to differentiate learning that is responsive to most learners needs.

Teachers draw on Ngā Rauru resources to weave te reo Māori and mātauranga Māori across the curriculum, valuing iwi aspirations, and increasing learner confidence in their culture, language and identity.

Design and delivery of the curriculum provides an appropriate range of practical, cultural and contextual learning experiences for students that encourage purposeful engagement in learning.

Well established partnerships, in school, and with the board and community, informs a collaborative response to meet the needs of learners.

Staff are highly collaborative, regularly sharing practice aligned to current PLD initiatives that inform a collective response to the needs of learners.

Parents and whānau receive relevant information in relation to their child’s learning with regular opportunities to share their knowledge and skills to actively support student learning.

Resourcing by trustees is based on sound evidence ensuring learners requiring additional support are provided with relevant assistance to meet their specific learning needs.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

continue to communicate regularly with parents and whānau to ensure that recent improvements in attendance are sustained over time for all learners

use current PLD for staff in writing that informs a structured, sequenced response that impacts positively on learner outcomes

gather research in relation to successful strategies that are shown to achieve successful outcomes for boys’ literacy and evaluate curriculum delivery to inform further opportunities to strengthen practice.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

the principal will explore current research to evaluate their current curriculum provision and develop further strategies shown to foster increasingly successful outcomes for boy’s literacy

teachers will continue their participation in writing PLD to develop the scope and sequence of the curriculum

staff and trustees will review attendance data regularly to understand the impact of their deliberate actions on achieving regular attendance for all learners.

Annually:

evaluate changes in delivery to the writing curriculum to understand the impact of the schools’ deliberate actions on improving the progress, achievement and engagement for all learners

evaluate and report the impact of teaching practices and attendance initiatives on outcomes for learners.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

strengthened, regular attendance at school for all learners

further development of the writing curriculum that positively impacts on the progress, achievement and engagement of learners

established, clear expectations in delivery of the scope and sequence for teaching and learning.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

27 September 2024

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 5 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).