KuraHub

← Back to search

Waimea Intermediate

Intermediate · State

Year levels
7–8
Total roll
550
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 35 schools in Tasman Region with a published location. Waimea Intermediate is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
Salisbury Road, Richmond
Territorial authority
Tasman District
Phone
03-5448994
Email
office@waimeaint.school.nz
Website
http://www.waimeaint.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Tasman

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

How to enrol

Check it on the school’s own website →

What is on offer beyond the classroom?

The sports, arts, clubs and groups this school names on its own website. Not a complete list of what any school offers, and not a count — a school that names more here has written more down, which is not the same as doing more.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

On offer
  • NetballNetball That is a wrap for the 2026 season.
  • BasketballBasketball Finals night on Monday
  • Mountain BikingMountain Biking NISSA MTB Champs are happening this term

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
464
Māori
55
Pacific
14
Asian
36
MELAA
16
Other
8
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 07497201442580300
Year 08379141122410277
Total8616342564990577
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 1136512941810208
Age 12378191022640298
Age 1313336054071
Total8616342564990577

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

47.3%

Waimea Intermediate47.3%
Tasman Region33%
Intermediate43.3%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female35.3%
Male57.8%
Māori124.8%
Pacific85.2%
Asian0%
Other48.4%
European/Pākehā45.3%
Total47.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

5.3%

Waimea Intermediate5.3%
Tasman Region3.2%
Intermediate4.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female5.8%
Male4.9%
Māori18%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā6.1%
Total5.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

1.4%

Waimea Intermediate1.4%
Tasman Region2.1%
Intermediate1.9%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male2.6%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā1.6%
Total1.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
451
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Medium urban area
Date opened
31 January 1959

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
7
Last reviewed
18 November 2024
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (18 November 2024)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 18 November 2024 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 550 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. August 2017

    642

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 5 October 2017

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 18 November 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Waimea Intermediate provides for learners in Years 7 and 8 in Richmond, Nelson. The school’s vision is Hīkina te mānuka, kia tutuki, kia tipu / Challenge to achieve and grow . The school is a member of Kāhui Ako ki Waimea .

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous ERO report of September 2022, ERO and the school have worked together to evaluate leadership of a learner-focused curriculum and teaching approaches that promote learner success in reading.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

High levels of engagement, confidence and achievement in reading.

The school’s analysis of achievement data shows strong evidence of sufficient or accelerated progress for almost all learners in reading.

A purposeful wellbeing focus has supported greater numbers of learners to experience a sense of self-esteem in relation to their progress.

A localised curriculum that is relevant, differentiated and responsive to learner needs.

Leaders reviewed existing approaches for teaching reading, and through targeted professional development have created coherent guidelines and shared expectations for high quality literacy practices.

Learner and whānau perspectives will be sought by teachers and leaders to make improvements in practice, and to strengthen home-school partnerships.

Deliberate hui , survey and school events have been initiated that provide a variety of opportunities for leaders and teachers to invite and receive feedback on reading developments.

Feedback and ideas from the parent and whānau community increasingly inform review and curriculum development.

Other Findings

The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s actions has been in establishing a designated literacy leadership team. This has strengthened consistency in the quality of teaching practices for reading. Evaluation of teaching and learning in reading has been thorough and shows outcomes for learners have improved. Senior leaders now plan to replicate this approach to review and enhance teaching and learning in mathematics.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Learners are enthusiastic, engaged and most progress well.

By the end of Year 8, most learners achieve at or above expected curriculum levels in reading, writing and mathematics, showing strong patterns of progress over the two years.

Students have a strong sense of belonging; they understand and enact the R.I.S.E. values of respect, integrity, self-management and empathy within an inclusive culture.

Wellbeing surveys show positive responses, particularly regarding learners’ relationships with teachers; action plans are initiated proactively in response to areas requiring improvement.

A majority of students attend regularly, school strategies have successfully improved attendance rates; however, the school is not yet meeting the Ministry of Education target for regular attendance.

Conditions to support learner success

A collaborative and distributed leadership approach purposefully builds teacher capability focused on improved teaching and learning outcomes.

Leaders analyse and use achievement data to set well-considered schoolwide goals and targets focusing on improving outcomes for learners.

Teaching teams regularly discuss student achievement data; consequently, teachers adapt their teaching practice and use responsive strategies to further promote learner successes.

A professional learning culture of observations, feedback and personalised support assists all staff to connect to the school’s vision and goals, growing a consistent understanding of high quality practice.

Refined curriculum and teaching approaches increasingly respond to students’ diverse strengths, needs and interests.

Students benefit from the school’s investment in explicit professional development and coaching for teachers; more consistent teaching across the school aligns with revised curriculum guidelines.

Students experience a broad and engaging curriculum; the explicit use of key competencies focus on curiosity, innovation and inquiry.

Students share their learning blogs for science, technology and the arts with their families using a digital platform; this celebrates learning and enhances meaningful partnerships.

Proactive review fosters a cohesive and collaborative staff culture, focused on achieving shared goals in partnership with the community.

Leaders have brought about well-considered changes to classroom and teaching team structures; this is informed by robust evidence of what works best for intermediate learners, and improves learner transition into, through and beyond the school.

Regular communication with the community celebrates success, shares innovations, and seeks parent and whānau feedback about teaching and learning, individual learner’s reports clear progress and achievement information.

Emerging cultural leadership is deliberately growing tikanga Māori and te reo Māori across the school; this is strengthening partnerships for learning with whānau Māori and mana whenua .

Learners with additional needs benefit from personalised programmes in a dedicated learning hub; learning programmes are well-considered with strong family involvement in planning and reviewing personalised goals.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

continue to embed and refine the peer coaching approach so that teachers continue to analyse the impact of their adapted teaching practices on outcomes for learners, sustaining reading gains

evaluate current teaching practices and achievement data for mathematics, including learner feedback, to identify professional development needs and new approaches for staff

build on existing whānau Māori and mana whenua connections to refine the localised curriculum and engage in a learning partnership that supports Māori learners enjoy and achieve education success, as Māori

further strengthen assessment practices and guidelines, including weaving new Kāhui Ako Transition Action Plan (KTAP) information through current teaching and learning planning and practices.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

evaluate current mathematics teaching and learning practices for quality and consistency, and identify next steps

cultural leaders ensure the iwi education plan, Ngā Kawatau me ngā Tūmanakotanga o Te Tauihu , is explicitly woven through strategic, annual and curriculum planning.

Every six months:

teachers have regular opportunities to grow their knowledge and use of assessment tools

senior and team leaders use achievement, engagement and wellbeing data, including feedback from learners, whānau and families, to monitor progress toward annual targets and goals

team leaders meet formally with teachers to discuss the impact of coaching and professional development on learner progress and achievement

whānau hui promotes regular home-school engagement in curriculum, teaching and learning conversations, improving attendance and supporting progress toward goals for learner success.

Annually:

leaders report to the board and communities on learner attendance, wellbeing and achievement to support responsive decision making

leaders evaluate the impact of staff professional development on learner outcomes to inform further improvements in teaching practices

leaders gather and use learner, whānau and family, and iwi aspirations to inform strategic, annual and curriculum planning.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

sustained improvements in reading and mathematics teaching and equitable learner outcomes as the result of clear guidelines and consistent assessment, planning and teaching practices

strong relationships with iwi and whānau Māori promote partnership in decision making, for learner success

a succinct summary of achievement and progress for the whole school, groups of learners, including for ethnicity and gender

learner attendance rates meet the Ministry of Education target for regular attendance.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

18 November 2024

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 7 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).