KuraHub

← Back to search

Tūtira Ashgrove School

Full Primary · State

Year levels
1–8
Total roll
424
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 293 schools in Canterbury Region with a published location. Tūtira Ashgrove School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
48 Seddon Street, Southbrook, Rangiora
Territorial authority
Waimakariri District
Phone
03-3138552
Email
admin@ashgrove.school.nz
Website
http://www.ashgrove.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Canterbury

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

How to enrol

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
396
Māori
49
Pacific
14
Asian
32
MELAA
4
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 016070037041
Year 025253056060
Year 037221047048
Year 048150048054
Year 055150050054
Year 063250041047
Year 077240060063
Year 0810012055061
Total511034603940428
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 055050031034
Age 065062054058
Age 078432051053
Age 085140040045
Age 098160057062
Age 103250044050
Age 115240046047
Age 1210010052057
Age 132002019022
Total511034603940428

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

9.6%

Tūtira Ashgrove School9.6%
Canterbury Region38.3%
Full Primary35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female5.7%
Male14.8%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other220.3%
European/Pākehā10.6%
Total9.6%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Tūtira Ashgrove School0%
Canterbury Region3.7%
Full Primary3.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Tūtira Ashgrove School0%
Canterbury Region1.7%
Full Primary1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
442
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Medium urban area
Date opened
25 January 1967

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
3
Last reviewed
24 September 2024
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (24 September 2024)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The same report — the board assurance report of 24 September 2024 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.

ERO and the board have identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

the school needs to check a primary identity document and a secondary identity document, required for safety checking of workforce [Children’s Act 2014].

The board has since addressed this area of non-compliance identified.

Read this board assurance report on ero.govt.nz →

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 424 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. June 2019

    514

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 19 August 2019

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 24 September 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Tūtira Ashgrove School is located in Rangiora, North Canterbury, providing education for students from Years 1 to 8. The school’s STAR Values ( Service, Trust, Positive Attitude, Respect ) and Five Ways to Wellbeing ( Take Notice, Connect, Give, Keep Learning, Be Active ) are part of its vision of Growing Together for Success . Tūtira Ashgrove School hosts the Pītau -Allenvale Satellite unit for North Canterbury.

There are two parts to this report.

Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Outcomes for learners are becoming increasingly equitable and excellent.

A large majority of learners, including Māori , achieve at or above expected curriculum levels in reading, writing and mathematics; leaders have identified these areas as strategic priorities to further improve progress and achievement for all learners.

Learners have a strong sense of belonging supported by consistently used inclusive and wellbeing practices.

The majority of learners regularly attend school; the school has yet to meet the Ministry of Education’s national target and strategies are in place to improve learners’ regular attendance.

Leaders consistently set and pursue improvement goals and targets and are building a culture committed to high-quality teaching and improved, equitable outcomes for learners.

Leaders and teachers use assessment data and feedback from learners and the community well to collaboratively plan and monitor the school’s improvement priorities.

Relational trust between staff and learners is evident at every level of the school and supports the achievement of the strategic priorities and vision.

Leaders build educationally focused relationships with Puketeraki Kāhui Ako and community groups which are improving learner outcomes.

Evidence-based teaching strategies and practices are used effectively to provide purposeful learning.

Learners have a curriculum that increasingly reflects local contexts in ways that learners can connect with their identity, language and culture, as well as the important cultural histories and stories of the school's location.

A school-wide focus on building teacher capability ensures learning through clear instruction and planning to meet the differing needs of learners.

Learners are well engaged in learning through a range effective of teaching strategies.

The school is embedding support for learning and wellbeing within a climate which effectively responds to learners needs, identities, languages and cultures.

Leaders and teachers increasingly value the diversities of learners’ identities, cultures and learning needs and clearly reflect these in the school’s strategic initiatives and actions.

A strength-based approach is used by leaders and teachers to identify learners’ abilities and needs, reduce barriers and improve access to learning; teachers focus on student wellbeing and use consistent, restorative approaches.

Effective systems and processes are in place for pastoral care through strong, mutually trusting relationships between the board, teachers, learners and whānau .

Strong mutually trusting partnerships and collaboration between the school and the community actively informs school planning and reviews of initiatives and actions.

Part B: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

embed high-quality teaching and effective assessment practices for learners to thrive and achieve at their highest level in reading, writing and mathematics

continue to ensure the diversities of learners, teachers and whānau are valued, celebrated and visible in learning within an inclusive learning environment to further enrich learning

further develop strategies to improve regular attendance.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

develop effective assessment practices in mathematics school-wide

evaluate and refine school-wide reading and writing teaching and assessment practices to further improve outcomes for learners

use assessment information to provide targeted interventions to accelerate learning for learners not achieving at expected levels in reading and writing.

Every six months:

review how well the diversities of learners, teachers and whānau are being valued, celebrated and made visible in learning

use analysed data and information to see whether high-quality, evidence-based reading, writing and mathematics programmes are becoming consistent school-wide, good practice is sustained and further improvement in outcomes for learners are evident

evaluate and refine attendance strategies.

Annually:

ensure effective evidence-based reading, writing and mathematics programmes are in place school-wide and strengthen teachers’ capacity to further improve the progress and achievement for all learners

use effective assessment practices in mathematics to inform teaching practice and learning programmes.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

evidence-based approaches to the teaching of writing are implemented and practised school-wide to further improve outcomes for learners

teachers using effective mathematics assessment information to know an overall achievement level for learners and identify next learning steps

the cultural histories and stories of the school's location and the diversities of learners, teachers and whānau are valued, celebrated and visible in learning

improved regular attendance rates.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

24 September 2024

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 3 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).