Toko School
Full Primary · State
- Year levels
- 1–8
- Total roll
- 105
- Enrolment zone
- Yes
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- State Highway 43, Stratford
- Territorial authority
- Stratford District
- Phone
- 06-7622849
- office@toko.school.nz
- Website
- http://www.toko.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Taranaki
Can my child go here?
This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work
Loading zone map…
Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.
Check if your address is in zone →
Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 98
- Māori
- 21
- Pacific
- 0
- Asian
- 1
- MELAA
- 0
- Other
- 0
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Year 02 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Year 03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
| Year 04 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Year 05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 06 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 07 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Year 08 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
| Total | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 96 | 0 | 107 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Age 06 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Age 07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
| Age 08 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Age 09 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Age 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Age 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Age 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 16 |
| Age 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 96 | 0 | 107 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Toko School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Taranaki Region | 41.7% |
| Full Primary | 35.6% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | Not available (source marker: "nd") |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Toko School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Taranaki Region | 4.1% |
| Full Primary | 3.9% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | Not available (source marker: "nd") |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Toko School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Taranaki Region | 1.6% |
| Full Primary | 1.7% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | Not available (source marker: "nd") |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 461
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Rural other
- Date opened
- 25 January 1893
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 4
- Last reviewed
- 10 February 2025
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (10 February 2025)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The board assurance report of 10 February 2025 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.
The roll ERO recorded, and when
ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 105 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.
August 2018
144
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 12 October 2018
October 2014
124
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 27 November 2014
We draw no line between these. Each was counted for its own report, years apart, by a different review team, and a roll moves between reviews for reasons none of these figures record — so the difference between any two of them measures nothing.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 10 February 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Toko School is located in rural Taranaki east of Stratford. The school provides education for Years 1 to 8, with a vision to provide quality learning for all in a caring community.
There are two parts to this report.
Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.
Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
The majority of students achieve at or above expected curriculum levels in literacy and mathematics.
Achievement information shows that most students, including Māori learners, are at or above the curriculum expectations in mathematics and reading, and the majority progress and achieve well in writing; there is identified disparity for boys in writing.
Students with additional learning needs are identified, have targeted support and progress well within an inclusive learning environment.
Learners have a strong sense of belonging, well promoted by positive teaching and learning relationships.
Attendance information shows the majority of students attend school regularly; the school is working towards meeting Government targets, and leaders have implemented processes to monitor attendance and its impact on learner achievement.
Conditions to support learner success
Leadership is strategic and highly collaborative with a deliberate focus on improving learner outcomes.
Strategic planning and improvement goals, developed in collaboration with the community, board and staff are focused on equitable and excellent outcomes for all students with clear measures for success.
Students at risk of not achieving are clearly identified, have targets set, are well monitored and their progress is regularly reported to whānau and parents and the board.
Leaders effectively build relational trust within the teaching team, resulting in collaborative approaches to relevant professional growth and responsive teaching programmes that are well aligned to strategic priorities and learners' needs.
Quality teaching and learning practices are being continuously strengthened and are strongly supported by explicit guidelines and an inclusive, localised curriculum.
Students are increasingly confident in discussing and describing their learning, as well as identifying the next steps in their learning journey (student agency).
The school’s localised curriculum, centered on its rural location and enviro-learning focus, engages students in purposeful learning contexts.
Leaders actively partner with mana whenua to reflect local tikanga , knowledge and histories in teaching practice, as well as increasing use of te reo Māori , that enriches learner understanding and experiences.
The school has well-aligned systems, structures and supports to bring about success and improvement for learners.
Leaders’ systematic evaluation for improvement focus creates opportunities to improve teaching quality and accelerate progress for those learners who require more support.
Staff develop a range of productive partnerships within the local community; the school demonstrates a welcoming and inclusive environment that benefits students’ wellbeing and sense of belonging.
The principal, teachers and board seek, use and value input from the school community in setting strategic priorities that influence ongoing school improvement and learner success.
Part B: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
continue to improve student achievement in writing, especially boys
continue to strengthen effective learning and teaching practices across all areas of the curriculum, especially how well learners know and can describe their learning and next steps (student agency)
evaluate the impact of improvement strategies on learner progress and achievement outcomes; this includes equity and excellence for all students and the ongoing effectiveness of professional development programmes
improve and sustain levels of regular attendance.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.
Within six months:
continue to raise student outcomes in writing, with a focus on reducing inequity for boys
continue to complete observations and feedback to teachers, including learner feedback, that pinpoint opportunities for further development of teaching and learning approaches in writing
measure progress in teaching capacity and capability to support learner agency within the local curriculum
continue to communicate with parents about the correlation between attendance and achievement to increase student attendance and meet the Government target
Every six months:
monitor and report progress toward goals and targets, and for groups of learners who are identified as needing to accelerate progress, achievement and engagement
review the impacts of improved teaching and learning practices on learner success, engagement and progress in writing
review how well learners know and can describe their learning and next steps (student agency)
review the strategies used to improve attendance to inform next steps
Annually:
analyse and report schoolwide progress and achievement to the board and community for reading, writing and mathematics, tracking shifts in the data and identifying further actions for improvement
evaluate and report on the effectiveness of professional learning on equity and excellence for all learners in writing and the ongoing usefulness of professional development programmes
review strategies and approaches to further strengthen student agency to inform ongoing improvement
review the attendance, progress and achievement for groups of learners requiring differentiated supports; determine the success of programmes and strategies designed to promote improvements and sustain high levels of attendance.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
further increased equity in achievement between groups of students
improved outcomes for all students in writing
students attending regularly.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Sharon Kelly Acting Director of Schools
10 February 2025
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 4 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).