Te Kōmanawa Rowley School
Contributing · State
- Year levels
- 1–6
- Total roll
- 227
- Enrolment zone
- Yes
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 48 Rowley Avenue, Hoon Hay, Christchurch
- Territorial authority
- Christchurch City
- Phone
- 03-3382472
- admin@rowley.school.nz
- Website
- http://www.rowley.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Christchurch · schools in Canterbury
Can my child go here?
This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work
Loading zone map…
Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.
Check if your address is in zone →
Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 104
- Māori
- 104
- Pacific
- 83
- Asian
- 18
- MELAA
- 2
- Other
- 0
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 34 |
| Year 02 | 19 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 36 |
| Year 03 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Year 04 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 36 |
| Year 05 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 32 |
| Year 06 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 23 |
| Year 07 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 34 |
| Year 08 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Total | 108 | 89 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 232 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 32 |
| Age 06 | 21 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 39 |
| Age 07 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Age 08 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 35 |
| Age 09 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 33 |
| Age 10 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 21 |
| Age 11 | 12 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 28 |
| Age 12 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 23 |
| Age 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 108 | 89 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 232 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
98.3%
| Te Kōmanawa Rowley School | 98.3% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 38.3% |
| Contributing | 35.6% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 135.2% |
|---|---|
| Male | 71.2% |
| Māori | 163.8% |
| Pacific | 21% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 178.1% |
| Total | 98.3% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Te Kōmanawa Rowley School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 3.7% |
| Contributing | 3.5% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Te Kōmanawa Rowley School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 1.7% |
| Contributing | 1.5% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 535
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- Some students taught in a Pacific language
- Urban / rural
- Major urban area
- Date opened
- 31 January 1973
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 4
- Last reviewed
- 3 December 2024
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (3 December 2024)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The same report — the board assurance report of 3 December 2024 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.
ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
having an approved FENZ evacuation scheme [Fire Safety, Evacuation Procedures, and Evacuation Schemes Regulations 2018]
evidence of referee checking as part of Workforce Safety Checking [Children’s Act 2014].
The board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.
The roll ERO recorded, and when
ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 227 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.
November 2019
107
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 7 February 2020
This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 3 December 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Te Kōmanawa Rowley School is located in Christchurch and provides education for learners in Years 1 to 8. The school’s three values are Whanaungatanga | Feso'ota'iga |Tauhi Va | Relationships; Tuakiritanga | Fa’asinomaga |‘Ilo’i kita |Identity; and Mana | Fa’aaloalogia | Ngeia | Dignity.
There are two parts to this report.
Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.
Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
Outcomes for learners are improving school wide; this is an ongoing priority for the school.
Learner achievement has improved over the last three years; less than half of all learners are achieving at or above curriculum levels in reading and writing, and a small majority are achieving at or above curriculum level in mathematics.
There is little disparity by ethnicity; however, boys are not achieving as well as girls in reading and writing.
Systematic wellbeing approaches are resulting in students recognising they have value and are increasingly proud of their learning.
Less than half of all learners are attending school regularly; the school is yet to meet Ministry of Education target for regular attendance, this is an area of strategic focus for the school.
Conditions to support learner success
Leaders are strategic and deliberate in building a supportive school culture that is learning focused.
Leaders set and pursue specific improvement goals and targets, including prioritising the acceleration of learners at risk of underachievement.
Leaders ensure planning and implementation of the school’s curriculum and teaching; expectations for high quality teaching are clear, shared and monitored to consistently support learner progress and achievement.
Leaders build effective relationships with other education providers and community groups to support learner transitions and increase opportunities for learner success and wellbeing.
Teachers and the curriculum are responsive to learners’ interests, needs and culture.
Meaningful learning experiences support learners to be engaged, experience success and progress in their learning.
Leaders and teachers have high expectations for learning and behaviour, supporting learners’ wellbeing needs so they can engage in learning and experience success.
Cultures within the school community are affirmed, valued and increasingly reflected in teaching and learning across the curriculum by teachers and leaders.
Key conditions that underpin successful schooling are increasingly embedded.
Leaders provide targeted professional learning opportunities for staff that are aligned with school’s improvement goals and learner needs.
A focus on relationships and relational trust are evident; the cultures of all learners, whānau and the community are affirmed and valued.
Leaders and teachers engage and actively promote the learning that is happening within the school with the community.
The board uses data and evidence well to make informed strategic decisions within the school.
Part B: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
continue to prioritise improving regular attendance, accelerating progress, and raising achievement in reading, writing and mathematics
further develop the leadership skills of team leaders, including their data analysis and evaluation capability, to grow their skills leading others and to enable them to support continued accelerated progress for learners
review and refine the literacy and mathematics programmes, assessment and teaching practices in response to professional learning, and to align with the national curriculum changes
strengthen learning focused partnerships with whānau.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.
Within three months:
gather and respond to student and whānau feedback and ideas about cultural inclusion and learning engagement
evaluate the actions implemented to improve attendance to inform future planning
review national curriculum changes and alignment with current practice and school expectations in literacy and mathematics and support staff with any professional learning needed.
Every six months:
team leaders analyse learner progress and achievement to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to accelerate learning towards expected curriculum levels to inform planning
evaluate professional learning in literacy and mathematics for its impact on teaching practices to improve learner outcomes to know what is working best
review how well learning partnerships with whānau increase engagement, wellbeing and achievement outcomes for learners.
Annually:
collect, analyse and respond to learner and whānau feedback to plan for and maintain an inclusive environment
evaluate the impact of strategies used to improve regular attendance and to accelerate learner progress and achievement
continue to develop the schools’ curriculum to align with curriculum changes and to maintain relevant local learning opportunities
report the above findings to the Board to inform strategic direction decision making.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
continued improvement in attendance, progress, achievement and wellbeing for all learners
effective school wide systems in place that inform teaching practice and continue to increase successful outcomes for all.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Shelley Booysen Director of Schools
3 December 2024
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 4 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).