KuraHub

← Back to search

Te Haikura a Kiwa

Secondary (Year 9-15) · State

Year levels
9–13
Total roll
1,869
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 569 schools in Auckland Region with a published location. Te Haikura a Kiwa is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
Dr Pickering Avenue, Manurewa, Auckland
Territorial authority
Manurewa Local Board Area
Phone
09-2683950
Email
admin@jchs.school.nz
Website
http://www.jchs.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Auckland

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

How to enrol

Check it on the school’s own website →

What is on offer beyond the classroom?

The sports, arts, clubs and groups this school names on its own website. Not a complete list of what any school offers, and not a count — a school that names more here has written more down, which is not the same as doing more.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

On offer
  • Basketball
  • FootballFootballNetball
  • Netball
  • Rugby Union
  • Rugby League
  • Tag Football
  • TouchFootballTouchVolleyball
  • Volleyball

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
268
Māori
694
Pacific
1,134
Asian
316
MELAA
43
Other
17
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 091722276427780391
Year 101732588293830440
Year 111502225461380380
Year 121021814771300300
Year 13+671554021190236
Total6641043287261324801747
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 1200100001
Age 131451684605610299
Age 141742648264870447
Age 151522265382440378
Age 161121854681290307
Age 17611603831210240
Age 18173816106065
Age 19+325000010
Total6641043287261324801747

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Academic results

Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025

78%

James Cook High School78%
Auckland Region90.1%
Secondary (Year 9-15)88%
State: Not integrated83.6%
New Zealand85.2%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female76%
Male79.9%
Māori72.6%
Pacific77.5%
Asian89.8%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā71.4%
Total78%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025

68.1%

James Cook High School68.1%
Auckland Region85.3%
Secondary (Year 9-15)81%
State: Not integrated75.4%
New Zealand77.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female69.7%
Male66.5%
Māori58.1%
Pacific68.5%
Asian83.7%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā71.4%
Total68.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025

49.7%

James Cook High School49.7%
Auckland Region71.7%
Secondary (Year 9-15)61.8%
State: Not integrated55.2%
New Zealand59%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female52%
Male47.5%
Māori38.5%
Pacific50.5%
Asian73.5%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā51.4%
Total49.7%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with VP Award — 2025

11.3%

James Cook High School11.3%
Auckland Region14.6%
Secondary (Year 9-15)15.2%
State: Not integrated14.4%
New Zealand14.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female9.7%
Male12.8%
Māori16.2%
Pacific6.8%
Asian24.5%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā8.6%
Total11.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)

Retention

Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025

75.4%

James Cook High School75.4%
Auckland Region88.9%
Secondary (Year 9-15)83.5%
State: Not integrated81.4%
New Zealand83%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female73.7%
Male77.1%
Māori65.8%
Pacific77.5%
Asian89.8%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā68.6%
Total75.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

31.4%

James Cook High School31.4%
Auckland Region29.7%
Secondary (Year 9-15)35.8%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female33.3%
Male29.7%
Māori38.1%
Pacific29%
Asian8.4%
Other61.2%
European/Pākehā46.4%
Total31.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

3.4%

James Cook High School3.4%
Auckland Region3%
Secondary (Year 9-15)4%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female3.2%
Male3.6%
Māori3.1%
Pacific4%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total3.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

2.2%

James Cook High School2.2%
Auckland Region1.4%
Secondary (Year 9-15)1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female2.3%
Male2.2%
Māori2.7%
Pacific1.8%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total2.2%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
529
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
Some students taught in te reo Māori or a Pacific language
Urban / rural
Major urban area
Date opened
31 January 1968

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
3
Last reviewed
12 September 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (12 September 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The same report — the board assurance report of 12 September 2025 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.

ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

Ensure the school’s Education Outside the Classroom (EOTC) policy and procedures are implemented with fidelity, and risk management procedures align with relevant legislation and guidelines [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015; Education Outside the Classroom (Ministry of Education)].

Ensure that every staff member (who is not a teacher) who is authorised to use restraint have been trained in appropriate physical holds by accredited physical restraint practitioners prior to their authorisation [Sections 99, 100 and 101 of the Education and Training Act 2020: limits, rules and use of physical restraint and behaviour management at registered schools; Ministry of Education (Physical Restraint) Rules 2023].

Ensure satisfactory safety checking of persons employed by the Board, including identity confirmation, police vetting and risk assessments of information collected [Sections 25, 26 and 27 of the Children’s Act 2014: Safety checks of children’s workers].

Obtain Police vetting for every person before the person’s employment or engagement at the school begins [Section 104 and Schedule 4 of the Education and Training Act 2020].

The Board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.

Read this board assurance report on ero.govt.nz →

What this report states about the school

As stated in ERO’s report of 12 September 2025 — not necessarily the position now. Each line quotes the sentence it came from.

Year levels
  • Years 9 to 13provides education for students in Years 9 to 13
Bilingual or immersion provision
  • Bilingual and immersion education in Puutake Te Wāhanga Māori, and bilingual Samoan language educationprovides bilingual and immersion education in Puutake Te Wāhanga Māori and bilingual Samoan language education
Also provides
  • Taonga Teen Parent Unitthe Taonga Teen Parent Unit
  • Rosehill and BLENNZ Special SchoolsRosehill and BLENNZ Special Schools
  • Alternative Educationand Alternative Education

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 12 September 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Every New Zealand state and state integrated school has an ERO review at least once every four years to evaluate what is working well for learners and what needs to be improved.

About the school

James Cook High School is a co-educational secondary school that provides education for students in Years 9 to 13. The current roll of approximately 1800 students includes just over 37 percent who identify as Māori and 45 percent who are from Pacific heritage; Samoan, Tongan and Cook Island Māori students make up the largest Pacific nation groups.

The school provides bilingual and immersion education in Puutake Te Wāhanga Māori and bilingual Samoan language education for students in O Le Tupu’aga .

The school hosts a number of other educational provisions, including the Taonga Teen Parent Unit, Rosehill and BLENNZ Special Schools and Alternative Education.

Education Counts provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement, school enrolments and school zones. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

An explanation of the terms and judgements used in this report can be found here: Reporting | Education Review Office

Improvement and progress

This section is about the progress the school has made since the November 2021 ERO report. It includes an explanation of the expected improvements and findings.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school has been working to strengthen professional leadership, including curriculum leadership to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

The school expected to see:

annual improvement target for Years 9 and 10 students in literacy and mathematics

improved curriculum reporting including regular reports on progress and achievement in literacy and mathematics and effective teaching strategies and practices

continued improvement in the quality of NCEA qualifications and vocational pathway success

the curriculum reviewed and improvements made to meet the needs and interests of students.

Some progress has been made against these areas. The school and ERO have identified that they remain areas for ongoing development.

What we know about learner success

This section provides a summary of learner success and wellbeing. The judgments are based on the ERO School Improvement Framework and the evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.

Less than a third Less than half Small majority Large majority Most Almost all

0 to 33% 34 to 49% 50 to 65% 65 to 79% 80 to 90% Over 90%

Learner Success and Wellbeing

This section provides a summary of learner success and wellbeing.

The school is beginning to improve student success. Improving achievement for students in Year 9 to 11 remains a priority.

The small majority of students achievement National Certificates of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 2 and 3, less than half achieve Level 1 and University Entrance (UE).

The school is yet to develop a clear understanding about student progress and achievement in literacy and mathematics in Years 9 and 10.

There is disparity in achievement for Pacific students, particularly at Level 1 and for boys in UE.

The school does not meet the Ministry of Education target for regular attendance with less than half of students regularly attending school; improving attendance remains an urgent priority.

Conditions to support learner success

This section provides a summary of leadership, teaching, curriculum and foundation school conditions for improvement.

Leadership is developing effective systems and processes to bring about improvement.

Changes in school leadership is positively contributing to the establishment of foundation organisational conditions to drive strategic improvement and raise student attendance, engagement and achievement.

Leaders work together well to identify and plan for improvement; they are focused on providing cohesive and high-quality leadership and implementing initiatives that promote the wellbeing and educational outcomes of students.

School leaders are developing better improving planning and implementation, with a focus on establishing clear, measurable outcomes that improve engagement and attendance, particularly for students most at risk of underachievement.

The school is strengthening teaching and curriculum delivery to improve engagement and achievement.

Leaders provide increasingly effective support for teachers to improve the quality of teaching; teachers recognise the need to have higher expectations for students learning progress and achievement.

Professional learning opportunities are provided for teachers to strengthen their practice. Developing teachers' knowledge of progress and achievement data, and its use to inform teaching and support student progress, is an area of focus.

Students experience a settled learning environment; their language, culture and identities are valued and celebrated; however, they are yet to experience a curriculum that engages them in high interest and meaningful programmes across all learning areas to improve attendance, engagement and retention.

School conditions that underpin ongoing school improvement continue to improve.

Leaders and teachers form educational partnerships across the school and local community to provide initiatives and resources aimed at supporting student wellbeing, attendance, and engagement at school.

The school is actively implementing initiatives aimed at improving attendance and maximizing learning time, to foster a positive, learning-focused school culture.

Leaders are focused on strengthening an inclusive environment to improve outcomes for all learners, including those with complex needs.

School leaders have identified internal evaluation and the use of data for planning as priorities; they are collaborating with external providers to strengthen evaluative capability and capacity to drive school improvement.

The School Board and leaders should continue building on recent improvements in professional leadership by planning further actions to strengthen a positive, safe school culture and environment for learning and work.

Learner success and wellbeing

Mokopuna are embedding positive attitudes towards te reo Māori as lifelong learners.

Mokopuna achieved a 100% pass rate in Level 2 NCEA 2023.

Mokopuna are excelling in an environment that reflects who they are as learners.

Mokopuna are inspired to learn and make connections between learning opportunities and future aspirations.

Conditions to support learners

The localised curriculum is inclusive and responsive to the aspirations of mokopuna .

A unique junior learning programme is preparing mokopuna to confidently transition into NCEA.

Leadership has purposefully established and developed influential leadership roles within Puutake .

Established educational partnerships with whānau , schools, and the wider community.

Priorities for Improvement

Embed Ngā Mātāpono to ensure the local curriculum continues to enhance learning outcomes for mokopuna .

Continue to strengthen Puutake leadership capability and capacity to support mokopuna outcomes.

Develop and implement a careers education plan to connect mokopuna to future pathway opportunities.

Next steps for improvement

This section provides more detail for the school to include in its strategic and annual planning for ongoing improvement across the school.

Key priorities

Improve regular attendance, engagement and retention for all students.

Strengthen tracking systems for student achievement and attendance, particularly in Years 9 to 11.

Establish a system of regular classroom observations to enhance the quality of teaching.

Accelerate progress, particularly for students in Years 9 and 10 and those at risk of not achieving.

Implement a professional learning programme that establishes high expectations and shared responsibility for improving student outcomes and achievement.

Continue to strengthen Puutake leadership capability and capacity to support mokopuna outcomes.

Actions for to bring about improvement

Within three months:

leaders have plan in place to improve attendance and monitor attendance at school and within school

senior and curriculum leaders review assessment practices and tracking to ensure they enable timely follow-up and inform teaching, planning, and reporting to meet student need

leaders and teachers update expectations for quality teaching to better support Years 9 and 10 students and enhance overall achievement and engagement

Within six months:

leaders review the progress of the attendance plan and adjust where needed

senior and curriculum leaders work together to implement effective assessment practices to track and monitor progress and achievement across the school

leaders roll out a programme of professional learning to strengthen teachers use of progress and achievement information, improve planning and the implementation of strategies that raise achievement and accelerate learning

Every six months:

leaders review and monitor the attendance plan to improve the attendance of students who do not attend regularly and adjust where needed

leaders work with teachers to review the success of teaching strategies to accelerate the progress of students and improve outcomes and identify areas for further support

leaders review the use of student progress and achievement information to inform teaching and learning across all learning areas and plan next steps as required

teachers monitor and track the progress of students in NCEA towards individual and schoolwide goals and targets and report progress

Annually:

leaders and the School Board review and interrogate student achievement and progress information and use it to determine the next steps that will continue to improve student achievement outcomes

curriculum leaders work with senior leaders to review the quality of teaching and assessment practices based on student success and retention data, plan and adjust programmes accordingly for ongoing improvement

the School Board reviews student attendance to inform ongoing strategic decision making and planning for ongoing improvement to meet Government targets.

Expected outcomes

The school has a built a culture of high expectations for student achievement and wellbeing that is underpinned by high quality teaching, effective assessment practices and student support systems.

Achievement outcomes are improved for all students across the school.

Increased levels of attendance, including more students engaged in learning and staying at school for longer.

Reliable and accurate student progress, achievement and attendance information is used to inform next steps for ongoing improvement.

Recommendation to the Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Secretary for Education consider an intervention to engage specialist help as listed in section 171(1)h of the Education and Training Act 2020 to bring about the following improvement in the following:

strengthening the quality of teaching and learning

strengthen leadership capability and capacity across the school to deliver improvement

improved student attendance planning, actions, monitoring and reporting to increase engagement in learning.

ERO will revisit the school early 2026 to assess progress towards improvement goals. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within four years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Sharon Kelly Director of Schools

12 September 2025

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 3 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).