Tararua College
Secondary (Year 9-15) · State
- Year levels
- 9–13
- Total roll
- 383
- Enrolment zone
- No
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- Churchill Street, Pahiatua
- Territorial authority
- Tararua District
- Phone
- 06-3768344
- admin@tc.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Manawatū-Whanganui
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 327
- Māori
- 159
- Pacific
- 21
- Asian
- 19
- MELAA
- 5
- Other
- 1
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 09 | 34 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 82 | 0 | 89 |
| Year 10 | 43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 78 | 0 | 89 |
| Year 11 | 37 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 83 |
| Year 12 | 31 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 0 | 57 |
| Year 13+ | 14 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 57 |
| Total | 159 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 319 | 0 | 375 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Age 13 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 77 |
| Age 14 | 39 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 76 | 0 | 86 |
| Age 15 | 44 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 89 |
| Age 16 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 54 |
| Age 17 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 47 | 0 | 56 |
| Age 18 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Age 19+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 159 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 319 | 0 | 375 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Academic results
Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025
86.4%
| Tararua College | 86.4% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 84.7% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 88% |
| State: Not integrated | 83.6% |
| New Zealand | 85.2% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 89.2% |
|---|---|
| Male | 82.8% |
| Māori | 78.3% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 84.9% |
| Total | 86.4% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025
78.8%
| Tararua College | 78.8% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 76.7% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 81% |
| State: Not integrated | 75.4% |
| New Zealand | 77.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 81.1% |
|---|---|
| Male | 75.9% |
| Māori | 60.9% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 81.1% |
| Total | 78.8% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025
63.6%
| Tararua College | 63.6% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 55.5% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 61.8% |
| State: Not integrated | 55.2% |
| New Zealand | 59% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 64.9% |
|---|---|
| Male | 62.1% |
| Māori | 52.2% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 66% |
| Total | 63.6% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with VP Award — 2025
10.6%
| Tararua College | 10.6% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 14.5% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 15.2% |
| State: Not integrated | 14.4% |
| New Zealand | 14.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 13.5% |
|---|---|
| Male | 6.9% |
| Māori | 8.7% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 11.3% |
| Total | 10.6% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)
Retention
Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025
80.3%
| Tararua College | 80.3% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 81.1% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 83.5% |
| State: Not integrated | 81.4% |
| New Zealand | 83% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 86.5% |
|---|---|
| Male | 72.4% |
| Māori | 69.6% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 83% |
| Total | 80.3% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
76.1%
| Tararua College | 76.1% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 45.5% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 35.8% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 70.6% |
|---|---|
| Male | 83% |
| Māori | 113.9% |
| Pacific | 77.7% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 54.9% |
| Total | 76.1% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
31.2%
| Tararua College | 31.2% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 6.2% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 4% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 38.8% |
|---|---|
| Male | 22.6% |
| Māori | 49.9% |
| Pacific | 42.1% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 19.4% |
| Total | 31.2% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
14.6%
| Tararua College | 14.6% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 2.8% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 1.7% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 20.9% |
|---|---|
| Male | 7.2% |
| Māori | 17.1% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 12.2% |
| Total | 14.6% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 510
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Small urban area
- Date opened
- 31 January 1960
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 4
- Last reviewed
- 9 February 2026
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (9 February 2026)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The same report — the board assurance report of 9 February 2026 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.
ERO and the board have identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
ensure that policy and procedures for identifying and minimising or eliminating hazards are current and being followed by all staff [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 Health and Safety at Work (General Risk and Workplace Management) Regulations 2016] .
The board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.
What this report states about the school
As stated in ERO’s report of 9 February 2026 — not necessarily the position now. Each line quotes the sentence it came from.
- Year levels
- Years 9 to 13
providing education for students in Years 9 to 13
- Years 9 to 13
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 9 February 2026 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Every New Zealand state and state integrated school has an ERO review at least once every four years to evaluate what is working well for learners and what needs to be improved.
About the school
Tararua College is a rural secondary school in Pahiatua , providing education for students in Years 9 to 13. The roll of approximately 380 students includes 82% Pākehā /NZ European, 41% Māori , and 6% Pacific learners. The school motto, ‘ Tama Tu Tama Ora; those who strive live fully’ is underpinned by the school values of respect, involvement, and personal excellence .
Education Counts provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement, school enrolments and school zones. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
An explanation of the terms and judgements used in this report can be found here: Reporting | Education Review Office
Improvement and progress
This section is about the progress the school has made since the February 2023 ERO report. It includes an explanation of the expected improvements and findings.
The school evaluated how well partnerships with parents and whānau and a deeper understanding of successful teaching strategies led to an improvement in achievement levels in Year 9 and 10 literacy and numeracy.
Expected improvements
The school expected to see students benefitting from a curriculum where teaching strategies effectively address numeracy and literacy learning needs across the junior school.
Findings
The school has made progress toward developing a curriculum that addresses literacy and numeracy needs across the junior school. Leadership structures, professional development, and teaching support are in place, creating a foundation for improvement. Further work is required to fully embed effective teaching practices and establish monitoring and evaluation systems to ensure consistent implementation across all classrooms and long-term sustainability.
What we know about learner success
This section provides a summary of learner success, wellbeing and foundation school conditions, including any education in Rumaki/Reo Rua settings. The judgments are based on the ERO School Improvement Framework and evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.
Less than a third Less than half Small majority Large majority Most Almost all
0 to 33% 34 to 49% 50 to 64% 65 to 79% 80 to 90% Over 90%
Learner success and wellbeing
This section provides a summary of learner success and wellbeing.
Improvement is required to strengthen and sustain student engagement and success.
In 2024, less than half of students achieved National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 1, a small majority achieved Level 2, and less than half achieved Level 3, with inequity for Māori learners at Level 2.
Results across all NCEA levels have declined over the last three years.
The school gathers some literacy and mathematics data for Years 9 and 10 and is yet to develop a clear understanding about student progress and achievement in literacy and mathematics in Years 9 and 10.
Less than half of students attend school regularly and regular attendance remains below the Government target. Regular attendance is improving, and chronic absence is decreasing.
Conditions to support learner success
This section provides a summary of leadership, teaching, curriculum and foundation school conditions for improvement.
School leaders are taking steps to develop the conditions needed for school improvement.
Leadership is building relational trust and fostering professional collaboration across the school to promote collective efforts that enhance student wellbeing and achievement.
Leaders are strengthening the quality and consistency of teaching and learning to address diverse student needs and improve progress and achievement.
Leaders and teachers systematically track and monitor senior students’ progress toward improvement targets to raise achievement; embedding this approach consistently at junior levels is a priority.
School leaders set clear and appropriate goals to improve attendance and achievement outcomes; a next step is to strengthen evaluation of the impact of actions taken.
The school provides a responsive curriculum that promotes engagement in learning.
Leaders and teachers offer a wide range of learning options, including online, community and tertiary-based learning opportunities, that reflect and support students’ interests, strengths and future pathways.
Relationships between students and teachers are characterised by mutual respect, fostering a positive inclusive culture that supports engagement, wellbeing, and achievement.
Students who need additional support are clearly identified on entry. Teachers are strengthening targeted provision to ensure these students continue to make progress.
Leaders prioritise inclusive and coordinated practices to promote learner success.
Leaders and teachers know their learners well and take an individualised approach that considers academic, social, emotional and cultural needs to support students.
The school’s pastoral team work collaboratively and use effective strategies to monitor learners’ wellbeing; students’ wellbeing and inclusion is prioritised and promoted.
Senior students’ vocational pathways are supported through extensive and purposeful partnerships with tertiary and training providers, businesses and careers programmes.
The school has identified the weaving of Te Tiriti o Waitangi throughout school operations to effectively enhance student engagement and wellbeing.
Next steps for improvement
This section provides more detail for the school to include in its strategic and annual planning for ongoing improvement across the school. It identifies key priorities and actions for improvement.
Key priorities
Grow consistent, high-quality teaching practices across the school.
Establish robust assessment and reporting systems for Years 9 and 10 in literacy and mathematics.
Strengthen school-wide evaluative capability to identify what works best for different learners and use evidence to drive continuous improvement.
Improve and sustain regular student attendance.
Actions to bring about improvement
Within three months:
leaders decide on an assessment and reporting framework for Years 9 and 10, including baseline data collection for literacy and mathematics
leaders implement the plan to raise attendance
Within six months:
leaders generate reliable data for Years 9 and 10 in literacy and mathematics that informs targeted actions to accelerate progress and achievement.
leaders and teachers develop and implement expectations for high-quality teaching aligned with the school’s teacher profile
leaders provide targeted professional learning to strengthen teaching practices and embed curriculum changes
Every six months:
leaders and teachers review teaching strategies and evaluate their impact on student progress and achievement
leaders and teachers monitor and track student progress schoolwide and provide professional learning and development as needed
leaders review attendance data and adjust strategies to address emerging barriers
Annually:
leaders and the Board review the impact of school initiatives and the consistency of teaching practices; use findings to inform strategic planning
leaders and the Board evaluate strategies to increase regular attendance and address barriers to learning; use findings to inform next steps.
Expected outcomes
Established assessment and reporting practices in years 9 and 10 that provide quality insights into student progress and achievement over time.
Consistent high-quality teaching that benefits all learners.
Strengthened school-wide evaluation capability to identify what works best for different students and drive continuous improvement.
Improved and sustained regular student attendance.
Recommendation to the Ministry of Education
ERO recommends that the Secretary for Education consider intervention for specialist help as listed in section 171(1) of the Education and Training Act 2020 in order to bring about the following improvements:
accelerating progress and raising achievement
improving attendance.
The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Report and is due within four years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Sharon Kelly Director of Schools
9 February 2026
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 4 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).