Taihape Area School
Composite · State
- Year levels
- not reported
- Total roll
- 254
- Enrolment zone
- No
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 26 Huia Street, Taihape
- Territorial authority
- Rangitikei District
- Phone
- 06-3880130
- jpearce@tas.school.nz
- Website
- http://www.tas.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Manawatū-Whanganui
What would the day look like?
The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- Uniform
- Required
Correct uniform is expected when travelling between home and school, while at school, and when representing our kura at events away from school.
- Required
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 140
- Māori
- 177
- Pacific
- 24
- Asian
- 10
- MELAA
- 2
- Other
- 0
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Year 02 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 03 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Year 04 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Year 05 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 21 |
| Year 06 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 21 |
| Year 07 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
| Year 08 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Year 09 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 16 |
| Year 10 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 21 |
| Year 11 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 28 |
| Year 12 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Year 13+ | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Total | 171 | 30 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 132 | 0 | 247 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Age 06 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Age 07 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Age 08 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
| Age 09 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 19 |
| Age 10 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 22 |
| Age 11 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 23 |
| Age 12 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 19 |
| Age 13 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 15 |
| Age 14 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Age 15 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 30 |
| Age 16 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Age 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Age 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 171 | 30 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 132 | 0 | 247 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Academic results
Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025
95%
| Taihape Area School | 95% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 84.7% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 91.4% |
| State: Not integrated | 83.6% |
| New Zealand | 85.2% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 100% |
|---|---|
| Male | 88.9% |
| Māori | 100% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | 90.9% |
| Total | 95% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025
90%
| Taihape Area School | 90% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 76.7% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 86% |
| State: Not integrated | 75.4% |
| New Zealand | 77.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 90.9% |
|---|---|
| Male | 88.9% |
| Māori | 90.9% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | 81.8% |
| Total | 90% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025
40%
| Taihape Area School | 40% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 55.5% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 71.7% |
| State: Not integrated | 55.2% |
| New Zealand | 59% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 36.4% |
|---|---|
| Male | 44.4% |
| Māori | 18.2% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | 54.5% |
| Total | 40% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with VP Award — 2025
15%
| Taihape Area School | 15% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 14.5% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 16% |
| State: Not integrated | 14.4% |
| New Zealand | 14.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 9.1% |
|---|---|
| Male | 22.2% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | 18.2% |
| Total | 15% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)
Retention
Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025
80%
| Taihape Area School | 80% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 81.1% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 86.6% |
| State: Not integrated | 81.4% |
| New Zealand | 83% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 100% |
|---|---|
| Male | 55.6% |
| Māori | 90.9% |
| Pacific | Too few to report |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | 72.7% |
| Total | 80% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
52.4%
| Taihape Area School | 52.4% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 45.5% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 26.5% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 24% |
|---|---|
| Male | 79.4% |
| Māori | 55.9% |
| Pacific | 27.7% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 56.3% |
| Total | 52.4% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Taihape Area School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 6.2% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 3.2% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Taihape Area School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 2.8% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 1.2% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 514
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Small urban area
- Date opened
- 27 January 2005
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 3
- Last reviewed
- 19 November 2025
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (19 November 2025)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The same report — the board assurance report of 19 November 2025 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.
ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
keeping records of all aspects of a safety check, including clear records of identity checks, referee checks, employment history and risk assessment before appointing staff [Children’s Act 2014]
the board must ensure that all employed teachers hold a current teaching practising certificate [Section 92(2) Education and Training Act 2020]
maintaining an up-to-date hazard register for the school property that identifies risk and suitable mitigation and management measures [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015]
maintaining a centralised accident register, and reporting of trends and patterns in accidents to the board [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015]
review and report on regular trial evacuations; fire, earthquake and lockdowns [Health and Safety at Work Act, 2015].
The board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.
What this report states about the school
As stated in ERO’s report of 19 November 2025 — not necessarily the position now. Each line quotes the sentence it came from.
- Year levels
- Years 1 to 13
provides schooling for students in Years 1 to 13
- Years 1 to 13
The roll ERO recorded, and when
ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 254 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.
February 2018
253
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 2 May 2018
This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 19 November 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Every New Zealand state and state integrated school has an ERO review at least once every four years to evaluate what is working well for learners and what needs to be improved.
About the school
Taihape Area School provides schooling for students in Years 1 to 13. The school vision is ’ Step forward together to nurture our potential’ is underpinned by school values of Rangatiratanga, Manaakitanga, Whanaungatanga and Wairuatanga . The school roll is 247 students, 58% of students identify as Māori , 34% as New Zealand European/ Pākehā , 5% have Pacific heritage and 3% are from other ethnic groups.
The school has a appointed an experienced principal who had been acting in the role for most of 2024. A Limited Statutory Manager (LSM) was appointed in September 2023 to support board operations in employment, curriculum management, teaching and assessment, property management, communications and finance. The LSM completed their work with the school Board in October 2025.
Education Counts provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement, school enrolments and school zones. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
An explanation of the terms and judgements used in this report can be found here: Reporting | Education Review Office
What we know about learner success
This section provides a summary of learner success, wellbeing and foundation school conditions, including any education in Rumaki/Reo Rua settings. The judgments are based on the ERO School Improvement Framework and evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.
Less than a third Less than half Small majority Large majority Most Almost all
0 to 33% 34 to 49% 50 to 64% 65 to 79% 80 to 90% Over 90%
Learner success and wellbeing
This section provides a summary of learner success and wellbeing.
The school is working towards improved outcomes for learners.
A large majority of students in Years 1 to 8 achieve at expected levels reading, writing and mathematics; strategies to accelerate students’ progress are developing.
Recently implemented strategies contributed to more students experiencing accelerated progress in literacy and mathematics; increasing equity in boys and Māori outcomes remains an ongoing focus.
National Certificates in Educational Achievement (NCEA) in Level 2 rose in 2024 but declined for Levels 1 and 3 with less students meeting NCEA literacy and numeracy requirements; lifting senior students’ success in NCEA and University Entrance are key next steps.
Regular attendance has recently improved from just over a third to over 50%, including a marked reduction in chronic absences; more targeted planning and actions will be required to meet the Government’s 80% target for 2030.
Conditions to support learner success
This section provides a summary of leadership, teaching, curriculum and foundation school conditions for improvement.
The principal has established foundations that support a student-centred school culture and a clear focus on improving student outcomes and learning opportunities.
Strategic leadership focuses on improving student access to quality teaching and lifting outcomes; building schoolwide professional leadership capability, including middle leadership, is an ongoing priority.
Higher and clearer schoolwide expectations for effective teaching practice are beginning; continuing to develop high quality teaching programmes and practices and high expectations for student achievement schoolwide remains a priority including success for learners involved in learning support programmes.
Well-paced change management processes contribute to a share sense of professional purpose from increased relational trust; staff, parents, whānau and student views are beginning to guide schoolwide developments.
The school is working towards increased consistency in high quality teaching practices.
Structured literacy and mathematics programmes support students’ purposeful engagement in learning in the primary area; more focused strategies for the middle and senior school students are in the initial stages of redevelopment.
Teachers are improving their use of assessment information to better plan and target their practices; schoolwide analysis, evaluation and reporting of progress and achievement is an ongoing next step.
Student views, teacher and whānau voice are in the early stages of informing the redevelopment of the school curriculum framework based on te ao Māori principles and local iwi knowledge.
Teachers and staff are involved in better targeted professional development and teacher learning groups; peer support practices include specific feedback to improve teaching practices.
Strengthening partnerships with parents, whānau and local iwi is a strategic school improvement priority.
Student leadership structures are growing; increasing students' ability to self-manage and understand their learning is an area for further development in the school curriculum.
Partnerships with parents are strengthening through better communication, a whānau group and more avenues for sharing information that supports students’ learning.
A sustained relationship with Mōkai Patea , a coalition of local iwi , contributes to an increased understanding of the importance of mana whenua as a basis for improving Māori student success.
Board membership has stabilised; strengthening their collective focus on school improvement by monitoring the impact of the strategic plan in lifting student achievement and outcomes is a key next step.
Next steps for improvement
This section provides more detail for the school to include in its strategic and annual planning for ongoing improvement across the school. It identifies key priorities and actions for improvement.
Key priorities
Strengthen annual planning for improvement with specific actions that focus on measurable learning and wellbeing outcomes including ongoing monitoring and reporting of the impact on students and what needs to happen next.
Develop a culturally responsive school curriculum framework that increases high quality teaching practices and use of assessment with high expectations for all students to experience success.
Build professional leadership and staff capabilities through specific measures and actions within the professional growth cycle, including access to relevant professional learning and development.
Strengthen attendance planning and supporting actions to increase regular attendance and reduce chronic absences.
Actions to bring about improvement
Within three months:
develop a more detailed annual implementation plan with specific actions for each term matched to measurable learner outcomes and staff accountabilities; actions include responses to the results from a student and staff wellbeing survey
extend the curriculum framework, including improved use of progress and achievement data to better target teaching programmes for Years 1 to 13
focus on building a professional school culture that supports schoolwide leadership for high quality of teaching and learning through clear accountabilities and expectations for teachers and leaders
regular and chronic attendance reporting to show progress and reset actions for the next term
Every six months:
monitor and report to the board on the impact of the annual plan and reset specific actions to increase progress and achievement
review and report on ongoing curriculum and staff professional development and their impact on progress and achievement
review and report on progress in building a positive school culture, including using a wellbeing survey to measure this
review and report on the progress in lifting regular attendance and identify specific strategies that increased attendance and engagement in learning
Annually:
review the impact of the annual plan improvement targets on students’ progress, achievement and survey measures of their wellbeing
review and continue to develop the school’s curriculum, including assessment strategies and expectations for effective teaching for Years 1 to 13, including vocational pathway success
report on the impact of professional development on improving teaching practices and learning support, particularly in literacy and mathematics for Years 1 to 10 and NCEA results
annual review of attendance planning and its impact on key groups of learners that needed targeted attention to improve their regular attendance.
Expected outcomes
Increased student progress, achievement and wellbeing driven through strengthened annual planning.
A culturally responsive curriculum framework that supports high quality teaching schoolwide and high expectations for student’ learning opportunities and programmes that improve outcomes.
Improved professional leadership and staff capabilities schoolwide.
Increased regular attendance and reduced chronic absences.
Recommendation to the Ministry of Education
Taihape Area School have made improvements to student attendance, accelerated progress in literacy and numeracy and the foundational school conditions that support success. As a next step to bring about sustained improvement ERO recommends that the Secretary for Education consider providing specialist help listed in section 171(1)b of the Education and Training Act 2020 in order to bring about the following improvements:
annual planning with specific outcomes measures, actions and accountabilities for leaders and staff including ongoing monitoring, evaluation and reporting of progress each term
set up systems to maintain health and safety systems for managing hazards, analysis and reporting of trends and patterns of accidents and completion of regular trial evacuations
support for property developments for the planned rebuild of the school premises
attendance planning to further sustain the recent lift in regular attendance.
The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Report and is due within four years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Sharon Kelly Director of Schools
19 November 2025
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 3 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).