Springfield School
Contributing · State
- Year levels
- 1–6
- Total roll
- 41
- Enrolment zone
- Yes
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 2 Tawera Lane, Springfield
- Territorial authority
- Selwyn District
- Phone
- 03-3184867
- office@springfield.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Canterbury
Can my child go here?
This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work
Loading zone map…
Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.
Check if your address is in zone →
Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 34
- Māori
- 6
- Pacific
- 2
- Asian
- 5
- MELAA
- 0
- Other
- 0
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Year 02 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Year 03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Year 04 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Year 05 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Year 06 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 37 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Age 06 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Age 07 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Age 08 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Age 09 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Age 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 37 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Springfield School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 38.3% |
| Contributing | 35.6% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Springfield School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 3.7% |
| Contributing | 3.5% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Springfield School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 1.7% |
| Contributing | 1.5% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 439
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Rural settlement
- Date opened
- 31 December 1870
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 4
- Last reviewed
- 3 December 2024
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (3 December 2024)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The board assurance report of 3 December 2024 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 3 December 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Springfield School is a contributing primary school and caters for students in Years 1 to 6. Springfield School identifies five key cultural competencies of Manaakitanga, Whanaungatanga, Ako, Tangata Whenuatanga, and Wānanga underpin the curriculum.
There are three parts to this report.
Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.
Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.
Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Previous Improvement Goals
Since the previous ERO report of July 2022 the school evaluated how well the local curriculum and teaching practices support students’ engagement, wellbeing, and achievement.
Expected Improvements and Findings
The school expected to see:
Programmes which have a clear focus on meeting the abilities, needs, skills and interests of students
The well-developed local curriculum is now strongly aligned with The New Zealand Curriculum, it has a focus on science and reflects the interests and needs of students.
Excellent and equitable achievement, wellbeing, and engagement outcomes for all students.
Student achievement is increasingly equitable, and most students are achieving at the expected curriculum level.
Priority students are identified, and their needs are met through intentional planning and teacher practice.
The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s action was the embedding of structured literacy and the incorporation of local history and contexts into the school curriculum.
Part B: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
A large majority of students make sustained progress and achieve at the appropriate curriculum level.
Most students achieve at or above the expected curriculum levels in reading, writing and mathematics.
All Māori students achieved at or above the expected curriculum level in reading, writing and mathematics.
Teachers prioritize student well-being and holistic development and nurture social and emotional skills, promoting empathy, resilience, and self-regulation.
The school has not achieved the Ministry of Education’s 2024 target with less than a third of learners attending school regularly.
Conditions to support learner success
Effective school leadership has a clear vision for learner success and the required steps needed to achieve this.
Parents, whānau and teachers work together with students to identify their strengths and learning needs, set goals, and plan responsive learning strategies and activities.
Strong professional relationships and shared leadership positively reinforce the school’s values and priorities, this enhances learners’ wellbeing and sense of belonging.
Teachers prioritise student well-being and holistic development by nurturing social and emotional skills, promoting empathy, resilience, and self-regulation.
Learner’s experience and benefit from high quality teaching practice and meaningful learning programmes.
Learners are well known by all staff, those at risk of not making expected progress are closely monitored and specific actions are taken to address their learning needs.
Clear expectations for teachers and learners result in settled and learning focused classrooms.
Teachers regularly review the curriculum to ensure it continues to engage learners, meet their needs and reflects the local context.
Teachers and the principal actively upskill their knowledge to ensure teaching programmes reflect tikanga Māori and te reo Māori.
The school has well-aligned systems and effective conditions for successful outcomes.
The board is highly supportive and has clear understanding of its governance role.
Purposeful partnerships with local schools, external agencies and the community enhance teaching and learning.
A wide range of feedback from learners, staff and the community is used well to inform resourcing decisions for improvement.
Part C: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
embed the local curriculum and continue to evaluate planning and teacher practice to identify ongoing improvements
engage with the community to better understand attendance issues and develop shared processes to support students to regularly attend school
continue to strengthen leaders and teachers use of internal evaluation to inform areas for development.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows:
Every six months :
consult the community to better understand attendance issues and develop shared processes to support students to regularly attend school
teachers and leaders undertake evaluation of the impact of professional development on improving teacher practice and raising student outcomes to inform planning for continued improvements
Annually :
gather and analyse assessment data to inform next steps for learning and evaluate the effectiveness of teaching programmes
review the local curriculum to ensure it aligns with strategic priorities and report to the board on progress and where to next
gather staff, student and whānau feedback and ideas and respond to identified needs and aspirations of stakeholders
analyse and report on attendance data and refine processes to support more students to attend school regularly.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
more students regularly attending school and making progress with their learning
sustained and improved outcomes for learning
meaningful evaluation supports continuous improvement schoolwide.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Shelley Booysen Director of Schools
3 December 2024
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 4 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).