KuraHub

← Back to search

Rosehill College

Secondary (Year 9-15) · State

Year levels
9–13
Total roll
1,773
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 569 schools in Auckland Region with a published location. Rosehill College is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
5 Edinburgh Avenue, Papakura
Territorial authority
Papakura Local Board Area
Phone
09-2950661
Email
inquiries@rosehillcollege.school.nz
Website
http://www.rosehillcollege.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Auckland

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

Uniform
  • Required| Bottoms — all students | Unisex navy long pants and/or shorts, or a navy skirt (short and long are available). No tartan skirts. Please note: no black pants or shorts to be worn. |
Where to buy the uniform
Term dates
  • Term 1, 2026: Monday 2 February – Thursday 2 AprilTerm 1 | Monday 2 February – Thursday 2 April
    Year stated asRosehill College term dates 2026
  • Term 2, 2026: Monday 20 April – Friday 3 JulyTerm 2 | Monday 20 April – Friday 3 July
    Year stated asRosehill College term dates 2026
  • Term 3, 2026: Monday 20 July – Friday 25 SeptemberTerm 3 | Monday 20 July – Friday 25 September
    Year stated asRosehill College term dates 2026
  • Term 4, 2026: Monday 12 October – Wednesday 9 DecemberTerm 4 | Monday 12 October – Wednesday 9 December
    Year stated asRosehill College term dates 2026
Getting there
  • Urban routes 454 (Conifer Grove), 456 (Wattle Downs), 457 (Waiata Shores) and 458 (Manurewa) run by Auckland Transport, and rural routes RH2-RH8 run by Brougham BusesRosehill College is served by urban routes run by Auckland Transport and rural routes run by Brougham Buses.

Check it on the school’s own website →

What does the school say about itself?

Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

International students
  • Accepted, as statedRosehill College welcomes international students who wish to gain internationally accepted qualifications, in an environment designed specifically to assist and guide them to achieve to their fullest potential.

Check it on the school’s own website →

What is on offer beyond the classroom?

The sports, arts, clubs and groups this school names on its own website. Not a complete list of what any school offers, and not a count — a school that names more here has written more down, which is not the same as doing more.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

On offer
  • badmintonOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • basketballOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • footballOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • hockeyOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • netballOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • rugbyOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • softballOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • volleyballOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • touchOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • tagOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • athleticsOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.
  • weightliftingOur sport codes include badminton, basketball, football, hockey, netball, rugby, softball, volleyball, touch, tag, athletics and weightlifting.

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
783
Māori
507
Pacific
422
Asian
578
MELAA
37
Other
16
International
27

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0911977115651660352
Year 1097103110721690368
Year 1110893111831502367
Year 12686896331489322
Year 13+596194821136275
Total4514025263215746171684
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 1200100001
Age 13957195341190279
Age 1410190109831750360
Age 1511293101731680372
Age 16706898431418317
Age 17656885611211271
Age 18711321120772
Age 19+115302112
Total4514025263215746171684

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Academic results

Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025

84.5%

Rosehill College84.5%
Auckland Region90.1%
Secondary (Year 9-15)88%
State: Not integrated83.6%
New Zealand85.2%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female86.1%
Male82.9%
Māori77.8%
Pacific76.9%
Asian90.2%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā87.3%
Total84.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025

72.3%

Rosehill College72.3%
Auckland Region85.3%
Secondary (Year 9-15)81%
State: Not integrated75.4%
New Zealand77.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female75.7%
Male69.1%
Māori66.7%
Pacific59.3%
Asian78.4%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā77.1%
Total72.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025

53.4%

Rosehill College53.4%
Auckland Region71.7%
Secondary (Year 9-15)61.8%
State: Not integrated55.2%
New Zealand59%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female54.9%
Male51.9%
Māori46.7%
Pacific45.1%
Asian63.7%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā55.4%
Total53.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with VP Award — 2025

11%

Rosehill College11%
Auckland Region14.6%
Secondary (Year 9-15)15.2%
State: Not integrated14.4%
New Zealand14.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female13.3%
Male8.8%
Māori15.6%
Pacific18.7%
Asian4.9%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā10.2%
Total11%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)

Retention

Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025

80.8%

Rosehill College80.8%
Auckland Region88.9%
Secondary (Year 9-15)83.5%
State: Not integrated81.4%
New Zealand83%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female82.1%
Male79.6%
Māori73.3%
Pacific71.4%
Asian90.2%
MELAAToo few to report
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā81.5%
Total80.8%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

44.7%

Rosehill College44.7%
Auckland Region29.7%
Secondary (Year 9-15)35.8%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female34.2%
Male54.9%
Māori74.1%
Pacific62.4%
Asian33.6%
Other42.9%
European/Pākehā29.5%
Total44.7%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

5.1%

Rosehill College5.1%
Auckland Region3%
Secondary (Year 9-15)4%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female3.9%
Male6.2%
Māori5.7%
Pacific8.7%
Asian6%
Other0%
European/Pākehā2.7%
Total5.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

1.2%

Rosehill College1.2%
Auckland Region1.4%
Secondary (Year 9-15)1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0.8%
Male1.5%
Māori0%
Pacific3%
Asian3.1%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total1.2%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
473
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Major urban area
Date opened
31 January 1970

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
4
Last reviewed
6 March 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (6 March 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The same report — the board assurance report of 6 March 2025 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.

ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

an up to date set of school policies and procedures is readily available to the school community or board members. A schedule of regular review is required to ensure compliance with all legal and regulatory requirements [Section 127 (1) and (2) Education and Training Act 2020]

the child protection policy contains provisions on identification and reporting of child abuse and neglect and has not been reviewed every three years [Vulnerable Children Act 2014, sections 18 and 19]

a policy on physical restraint in accordance with Education (Physical Restraint) Rules 2023 (MOE) [Sections 99-101 of the Education and Training Act 2020]

the policy for prevention of bullying that includes a definition of bullying, the categories of bullying, an outline of approaches to preventing bullying and managing bullying behaviour [Section 127 (1) Education and Training Act 2020; Good Practice]

The board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.

Read this board assurance report on ero.govt.nz →

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 1773 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. October 2018

    1719

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 17 December 2018

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 6 March 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Rosehill College is in Papakura , Auckland, and provides education for students in Years 9 to 13. The key values underpinning all aspects of the College are Hihiritanga, Rangatiratanga, Whanaungatanga and Manaakitanga.

There are two parts to this report.

Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Some students are engaged, making progress and achieving at expected levels.

The majority of students achieve National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) at Levels 1, 2 and 3, with a smaller proportion achieving University Entrance; there is some disparity in achievement for Māori and Pacific students.

Sufficient reliable data is not yet collected for students in Years 9 and 10 to make a judgement on overall achievement or progress.

The school is behind the Ministry of Education 2024 target for regular attendance.

Conditions to support learner success

Leaders are establishing systems and processes to improve outcomes for learners.

Leaders are taking steps to develop a culture of high expectations for equity and excellence that aligns with the school vision, values and objectives.

Leaders are taking steps to recruit, retain and grow effective teaching teams and improve the quality and consistency of teaching and learning to improve achievement outcomes for learners.

Leaders are establishing frameworks to promote consistency in behaviour management, teaching, assessment and initiatives for learning support, mentoring and wellbeing that foster a sense of connection to the school for students.

The quality of teaching and expectations for learning are variable.

Teachers increasingly focus on supporting learners to gain sound foundational skills in literacy and numeracy to enable them to access all areas of the curriculum.

The refreshed curriculum reflects more meaningful and relevant contexts to better engage students in learning.

Regular reporting on student engagement and attendance allows parents and whānau to work in partnership with the school to support student success.

School conditions are increasingly aligning with its objectives, fostering ongoing improvement.

Leaders are focused on strengthening an inclusive environment to improve holistic outcomes for all learners, including those with complex needs.

Leaders and teachers recognise, value and increasingly cater for the different identities, languages and cultures of learners.

School leaders agree that building internal evaluation, including the effective use of data to inform planning, is a priority; leaders are working with external providers to build evaluative capability and capacity.

The school board is well-connected to the school, reflects the community it serves, and uses data and other information to guide strategic decision making.

Part B: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

continue to implement initiatives to improve school attendance to meet the Ministry of Education targets

define and embed consistent use of effective teaching strategies to improve engagement, raise achievement and retention, and reduce disparity for Māori and Pacific learners

enhance the collection and monitoring of achievement data, using this information to inform planning and implement targeted interventions to improve student outcomes

continue to develop and embed the whole school literacy and numeracy programme.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within three months:

refresh, make explicit, and implement the school’s guidelines for consistent and effective teaching

establish a system of regular classroom observations and feedback from school leaders to enhance teachers’ skills and support their ongoing development, with information documented for reflection

Every six months:

leaders will continue to evaluate and refine approaches used to increase attendance

provide professional learning on data analysis to inform classroom teaching and implement interventions to improve outcomes for individuals and identified groups of students

continue to upskill all teachers in effective teaching of literacy and numeracy to support improved engagement and achievement

Annually:

plan and implement a suite of tailored professional development for teachers, based on student voice feedback, achievement data and identified needs

review effectiveness of teacher practice based on student success and retention data, and re-plan programmes accordingly

review classroom teachers’ use of data to inform planning and responding to learner needs

evaluate implementation of the whole school literacy and numeracy programme to inform next steps.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

improved levels of attendance, achievement, progress and retention for all groups of learners

consistently high expectations and effective teaching practice evidenced through student feedback and classroom observation information

teachers being confident and capable in the use of data to inform teaching and learning

improved literacy and numeracy outcomes for all students.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Sharon Kelly Acting Director of Schools

6 March 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 4 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).