KuraHub

← Back to search

Reporoa School

Contributing · State

Year levels
1–6
Total roll
84
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 305 schools in Waikato Region with a published location. Reporoa School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
34 Massey Road, Reporoa
Territorial authority
Rotorua District
Phone
07-3338350
Email
office@rep.school.nz
Website
http://www.rep.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Rotorua · schools in Waikato

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

School day starts
  • 9amPlease make sure your child is at school in plenty of time for the start of the school day at 9am.
Office hours
  • 8:30am to 3:10pmThe school secretary is in attendance daily from 8:30am to 3:10pm during term time.
Term dates
  • Term 1, 2026: Monday, 2nd February 2026 – Thursday, 2nd April 2026Term 1 | Monday, 2nd February 2026 | Thursday, 2nd April 2026
  • Term 2, 2026: Monday, 20th April 2026 – Friday, 3rd July 2026Term 2 | Monday, 20th April 2026 | Friday, 3rd July 2026
  • Term 3, 2026: Monday, 20th July 2026 – Friday, 25th September 2026Term 3 | Monday, 20th July 2026 | Friday, 25th September 2026
  • Term 4, 2026: Monday, 12th October 2026 – Monday, 14th December 2026Term 4 | Monday, 12th October 2026 | Monday, 14th December 2026

Check it on the school’s own website →

What does the school say about itself?

Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

In their words
  • We provide an education that is learner focused, inclusive and supported by productive partnerships.

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
45
Māori
34
Pacific
3
Asian
13
MELAA
2
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0130000708
Year 02815006016
Year 03602007012
Year 04403005011
Year 051001007016
Year 069010010016
Year 0700000101
Total401120043080
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 0520000607
Age 06912007014
Age 07705007016
Age 0820200508
Age 091102007018
Age 109010010016
Age 1100000101
Total401120043080

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

442.2%

Reporoa School442.2%
Waikato Region53.9%
Contributing35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male693.5%
Māori651.6%
PacificToo few to report
Asian0%
OtherToo few to report
European/Pākehā283.7%
Total442.2%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Reporoa School0%
Waikato Region6.6%
Contributing3.5%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Reporoa School0%
Waikato Region2.4%
Contributing1.5%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
487
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Rural other
Date opened
25 January 1923

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
4
Last reviewed
13 March 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (13 March 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 13 March 2025 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 13 March 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Reporoa School is in Reporoa Village, a rural community between Rotorua and Taupō , and provides education for students in Years 1 to 6. Reporoa School prioritises a positive and inclusive culture that is supported by the ‘REPS’ values of students being Respectful, Engaged, Positive and Striving.

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous ERO report of September 2022, ERO and the school have worked together to evaluate how well school-wide structures, programmes and expectations for teaching and learning empowered student self-management for learning, collaboration, and inclusion resulting in outcomes of equity and excellence for all learners.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

Improved outcomes of equity and excellence for all learners.

A structured literacy approach has been implemented schoolwide resulting in improved progress and achievement for students in reading and writing, with a large majority achieving at and above curriculum expectations.

A large majority of students achieve at and above in mathematics, this level of achievement has been sustained over the course of the evaluation.

Improved quality and consistency of teaching and learning practices.

Schoolwide structures for the planning and teaching of reading, writing and mathematics are established; shared, high expectations for planning, teaching and consistency have supported improved progress and achievement for students.

There has been significant progress in reading outcomes for students including higher numbers of students achieving above curriculum expectations.

Processes for student goal setting and self-management of learning are not yet consistent across the school.

Other Findings

During the evaluation, it was found that the school has strengthened positive relationships with local iwi and mana whenua . This has supported the school to implement a school curriculum, with increased integration of te reo Māori and tikanga Māori, resulting in improved engagement in learning and outcomes for students.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Outcomes are improving for most students.

A large majority of students are achieving at and above expected curriculum levels in reading, writing and mathematics; addressing disparity for Māori learners and boys continues to be a priority.

Outcomes for students overall in reading and writing have improved over time.

Less than half of students attend school regularly; improving attendance to meet the Ministry of Education target is a focus of importance for the school and whānau.

Conditions to support learner success

Leaders foster an inclusive school culture focused on quality teaching and learning.

Leaders increasingly support and promote leadership opportunities for teachers; this is building leadership capability within the school.

Professional learning initiatives are informed by student assessment and are increasingly effective in positively impacting student progress and achievement.

Collaborative networks and responsive support programmes are established, leading to increased opportunities for learning and success, particularly for learners requiring additional assistance.

Teaching is increasingly responsive to the differing needs of students.

Structured literacy teaching practices have resulted in improved student progress and achievement in reading and writing.

Strengthened use of assessment information and collective monitoring of student progress, has led to increasingly deliberate teaching and learning practices in response to student needs.

Established expectations for quality teaching and learning are shared and monitored; this has increased consistency of planning and curriculum implementation across the school.

Students’ engagement and progress in learning is supported through a curriculum connected to its local histories and context.

The school has well established conditions that underpin school improvement.

Leaders and teachers regularly involve parents, whānau and community in sharing aspirations for their children; this information informs school decision making and provides opportunities to strengthen engagement and positive outcomes for students.

Outcomes for student wellbeing are regularly reviewed and analysed; established programmes and processes support positive wellbeing.

Leaders and teachers use information from a range of sources to monitor and evaluate the impact of actions focused on improving outcomes for learners, and to plan for ongoing improvement.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

continue to improve progress and achievement for all students in reading, writing and mathematics, with a focus on accelerating achievement for students not yet at their expected curriculum level

strengthen and embed effective use of assessment data for teachers and leaders to regularly monitor and evaluate the impact of teaching and learning practices on student progress and achievement

embed schoolwide consistency in planning and implementation of literacy and mathematics programmes

monitor and review strategies to improve rates of regular attendance for all learners.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

identify teachers' strengths and development needs in assessment practices to inform professional learning requirements

develop improvement plans for literacy and mathematics that include monitoring and evaluating student progress and next steps for continued improvement

review and strengthen processes to collectively monitor the impact of teaching, learning and use of assessment information on learner progress and achievement.

Every six months:

monitor the levels of accelerated progress for students identified as not yet achieving expected outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics

scrutinise how well assessment information is used to monitor student progress and to guide responsive teaching and learning; use this information to support ongoing improvement

monitor and report on the impact of strategies used to improve learner attendance.

Annually:

evaluate learner progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics, with a particular focus on improved equity and accelerated progress for students not achieving at expected curriculum levels

analyse how well teachers and leaders are using assessment information to effectively respond to learner needs; use these findings to clarify strengths and areas for further development

evaluate schoolwide consistency in the planning and implementation of structured mathematics and literacy learning programmes, to support sustainability of practice and positive learning outcomes

analyse and report on patterns and improvements in attendance, to inform ongoing development.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

improved engagement, achievement and equitable outcomes for all students in literacy and mathematics

embedded systems and processes for gathering and using assessment information to guide schoolwide improvement priorities and supporting actions

robust and sustainable processes for effective monitoring and evaluation of the impact of teaching and learning on students’ progress and achievement

increased rates of regular attendance.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Sharon Kelly Acting Director of Schools

13 March 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 4 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).