KuraHub

← Back to search

Puni School

Contributing · State

Year levels
1–6
Total roll
206
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 569 schools in Auckland Region with a published location. Puni School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
357 Waiuku Road, Puni, Pukekohe
Territorial authority
Franklin Local Board Area
Phone
09-2387403
Email
admin@puni.school.nz
Website
http://www.puni.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Auckland

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

Uniform

Not stated on the school’s website.

Getting there
  • A bus service operates from Pukekohe bringing students to school for the 8.30am start; in the afternoon the bus returns at 2.30pm to take students homeA bus service operates from Pukekohe bringing students to school for our 8.30am start before transporting Intermediate and High School children back to the township. In the afternoon the bus returns at 2.30pm to take students back home again.

Check it on the school’s own website →

What does the school say about itself?

Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

International students
  • Accepted, as statedPuni School is registered to educate International Students from Year 1 (5 year olds) to Year 6 (11 year olds).

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
158
Māori
37
Pacific
27
Asian
24
MELAA
10
Other
1
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 016782127038
Year 025660123032
Year 036414027030
Year 0410631028038
Year 053522125032
Year 067470130040
Year 073111012116
Year 0800000011
Total4033281041722227
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 057782127038
Age 064660123032
Age 075314024027
Age 0811631029039
Age 093622125032
Age 107570131042
Age 113011013015
Age 1200000022
Total4033281041722227

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

11.4%

Puni School11.4%
Auckland Region29.7%
Contributing35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male24.1%
Māori59.4%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total11.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Puni School0%
Auckland Region3%
Contributing3.5%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Puni School0%
Auckland Region1.4%
Contributing1.5%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
430
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Rural other
Date opened
27 October 1878

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
5
Last reviewed
31 July 2024
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (31 July 2024)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 31 July 2024 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 31 July 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Puni School is located near Pukekohe , bringing together a mix of rural and urban families across a range of ethnicities. The school provides education for students in Years 1 to 6. The school’s values are aligned to their Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L) approach. International students are hosted.

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritized for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous report of July 2022, the school and ERO worked together to evaluate how effectively student outcomes improve through the strengthening of teacher knowledge and capability in evaluation.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

Improved learner outcomes and rates of progress (with a focus on mathematics).

Significant positive shifts have been made in student outcomes in mathematics.

Achievement data shows strong evidence of accelerated progress for students who needed this most.

Increased capability in evaluation to inform practice that drives continuous improvement.

Meaningful professional learning has strengthened collective capability to use evaluation effectively to inform next steps for teaching and learning.

Leaders and teachers are increasingly able to evaluate the effectiveness of the range of tailored approaches used to increase student achievement.

Other Findings

The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s action, is the increase in mathematics achievement and strengthened collective evaluation capability to improve outcomes for all students.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Achievement outcomes for learners show continuous improvement over time and are increasingly equitable.

Most learners achieve at or above curriculum expectations in reading, writing and mathematics, with increasingly equitable outcomes for Māori learners.

Students with additional learning needs are well supported and progress in relation to their individual goals.

Learners demonstrate school values through genuine care for each other that increases their wellbeing, engagement and success.

Attendance data shows improvement over time; most students attend school regularly in relation to the Ministry of Education’s targets.

Conditions to support learner success

Strategic, collaborative leadership prioritises school improvement, using evidence-based knowledge to enhance learner success.

Leaders model and encourage consistent approaches in teaching, assessment and evaluation that promote seamless learning for all students.

Well-considered professional development is targeted, planned and implemented to areas of focus for improving learning outcomes.

The board works alongside leaders to ensure planning is strategic and focused on learner success.

Teachers and leaders increasingly refine, adapt and use consistent teaching practices to raise student outcomes.

Students’ learning needs, interests and cultural identities are well responded to through the implementation of increasingly effective systems and processes.

Teachers have comprehensive systems to effectively track and monitor progress, ensuring planning and teaching are responsive to the different needs of learners.

Learners experience an engaging curriculum that reflects the local context and aspirations of the wider community.

The school has well established conditions that promote successful school improvement.

Students benefit from positive relationships within the school that enhance calm, learning-centred classroom environments.

A collaborative team culture enables all staff to work together and liaise with external agencies to improve outcomes for learners.

Consultation and planning with students, staff, whanāu and the Māori community enriches the curriculum with te reo Māori, tikanga Māori, mātauranga Māori and te ao Māori .

Leaders and teachers work alongside whānau as respected and valued partners in learning to progress school priorities for learner success.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

embed and monitor targeted approaches to raising achievement in reading and writing, in line with positive mathematics progress

continue to strengthen teachers’ ability to manage change that benefits their practice and student outcomes

further develop teachers’ evaluation capability and practice to guide continuous improvement.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within three months:

develop and implement a tailored, purposeful evaluation cycle to support continuous improvement.

Every six months:

monitor and evaluate progress towards raising achievement outcomes in reading and writing

plan and implement professional learning opportunities to extend teachers’ growth mindsets to effectively manage beneficial change in education

review the impact of strengthening evaluation capability at leadership, syndicate and teacher levels for increasing student success.

Annually:

evaluate and analyse the effectiveness of the literacy focus, comparing these outcomes with achievement data in mathematics

review the impact of the implemented evaluation cycle to monitor effectiveness of targeted actions to improve outcomes for all learners

provide evidence-based reporting to the board in relation to schoolwide consistency of practice and responses to change management, and the impact of these on teaching and learner outcomes.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

increased student outcomes in literacy that are comparable with mathematics achievement data

the implementation of a tailored, schoolwide evaluation framework that sharpens decision-making for the benefit of all students and groups of learners.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

31 July 2024

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 5 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).