KuraHub

← Back to search

Prospect School

Contributing · State

Year levels
1–6
Total roll
324
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 569 schools in Auckland Region with a published location. Prospect School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
Rosier Road, Glen Eden, Auckland
Territorial authority
Waitākere Ranges Local Board Area
Phone
09-8185219
Email
admin@prospect.school.nz
Website
http://www.prospect.school.nz/
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Auckland

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

Uniform
  • RequiredThe uniform consists of the teal Prospect polo shirt (RRP $35.00), the black Prospect zip-up polar fleece (RRP $55.00) and black shorts / pants or skirt.

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
59
Māori
93
Pacific
186
Asian
62
MELAA
20
Other
4
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 011827115013057
Year 021728104011056
Year 03223088013061
Year 04173410505055
Year 051533112113055
Year 06132316409051
Year 0704200208
Total10217968281660343
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 05152484011047
Age 061830134011060
Age 07232798014062
Age 0817349605056
Age 091633112114055
Age 10132613409051
Age 11055002012
Total10217968281660343

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

69.9%

Prospect School69.9%
Auckland Region29.7%
Contributing35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female17.9%
Male109.5%
Māori123%
Pacific74.5%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā144.5%
Total69.9%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Prospect School0%
Auckland Region3%
Contributing3.5%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Prospect School0%
Auckland Region1.4%
Contributing1.5%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
495
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Major urban area
Date opened
3 February 1958

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
4
Last reviewed
21 November 2022
Latest report
Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report
Report type
Profile report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (21 November 2022)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 21 November 2022 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 324 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. May 2016

    349

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 7 September 2016

  2. October 2011

    361

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 19 December 2011

We draw no line between these. Each was counted for its own report, years apart, by a different review team, and a roll moves between reviews for reasons none of these figures record — so the difference between any two of them measures nothing.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 21 November 2022 — “Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

Background

This Profile Report was written within 14 months of the Education Review Office and Prospect School working in Te Ara Huarau , an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website www.ero.govt.nz

Context

Prospect School is a multicultural contributing school, located in Glen Eden, Auckland. The school caters for year 1 to 6 ākonga /learners and has a Māori bilingual unit. The school’s vision is to create positive futures for ākonga through inclusive and inspirational learning.

Prospect School’s strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are:

knowledgeable and passionate staff build capacity

an explicit focus on student achievement

increased student and community engagement

a commitment to tangata whenua and Te Tiriti o Waitangi

the school’s core values, skills, knowledge and behaviours made explicit through Te Ara Tupuranga - the guiding values and behaviours for all.

You can find a copy of the school’s strategic and annual plan on Prospect School’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to evaluate how effectively Prospect School’s learning conditions and teaching practices result in positive and equitable ākonga outcomes.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is:

a strength-based focus where learning needs are at the heart of what they do

equity for Māori , Pacific and diverse learners is embedded in Te Ara Tupuranga

wellbeing and belonging are key components in the school’s culturally responsive local curriculum

targeted interventions support ākonga to be successful in who they are

the school, whānau and community are engaged in a positive learning-centred relationships

teaching practices and learning outcomes are reviewed, adapted, and monitored to meet ākonga needs

the school’s strategic goals focus on effective teaching and quality learning outcomes, giving effect to te Tiriti o Waitangi , and an unrelenting focus on ākonga learning.

The school expects to see:

ākonga who are agentic in their learning and can describe their goals, achievements and what success looks like for them

classroom cultures that are well established and consistently characterised by connectedness, respect, inclusion, empathy, collaboration, and safety, focused on student belonging and wellbeing

teachers consistently using a range of strategies to fully engage learners

whānau and community engagement focused on enriching ākonga learning opportunities

teachers work is connected, relevant, challenging, and meaningful

a refined and streamlined Te Ara Tupuranga providing an explicit pathway for learning.

Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support it in its goal to focus on positive and equitable ākonga outcomes:

ākonga are engaged in their learning and seek out opportunities for new learning

ākonga , staff and whānau understand the importance of living their school values

passionate and respectful teachers are collectively committed to equitable outcomes for ākonga

supportive, knowledgeable, evidence informed school leadership

an articulate, fully collaborative team approach to implementing innovation

strength-based, well-developed, school-wide systems, practices, and processes

whānau , staff and community have an unrelenting focus on learning and care.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise to:

continue to embed and monitor the refined Te Ara Tupuranga values, skills, knowledge and behaviours across an integrated curriculum

define and evaluate levels of consistency and engagement with all stakeholders in implementing a refined Te Ara Tupuranga

consider levels of responsiveness across the wider curriculum; how the school supports teachers and ākonga to realise their potential, their feelings of being successful and experiencing belonging

further strengthening opportunities and engagement with whānau and community

evidencing through an evaluative process the excellent and equitable outcomes for all ākonga at Prospect School.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Filivaifale Jason Swann Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern) Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

21 November 2022

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 4 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).