KuraHub

← Back to search

Opotiki School

Full Primary · State

Year levels
1–8
Total roll
318
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 165 schools in Bay of Plenty Region with a published location. Opotiki School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
80-88 Church Street, Opotiki
Territorial authority
Ōpōtiki District
Phone
07-3156362
Email
opotikiprimary@opotiki.school.nz
Website
https://www.opotiki.school.nz/
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Bay of Plenty

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
63
Māori
292
Pacific
27
Asian
6
MELAA
0
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 012600002028
Year 023500004039
Year 033310002036
Year 042100002023
Year 053730002041
Year 063032004036
Year 073610004037
Year 083321007040
Total25110300270280
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 052700002029
Age 063600004040
Age 073110002034
Age 082000002022
Age 093830002042
Age 102832004034
Age 113600004037
Age 123231007039
Age 1330000003
Total25110300270280

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Opotiki School0%
Bay of Plenty Region37.4%
Full Primary35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Opotiki School0%
Bay of Plenty Region3.8%
Full Primary3.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Opotiki School0%
Bay of Plenty Region1.4%
Full Primary1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
555
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Small urban area
Date opened
25 January 1873

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
4
Last reviewed
23 January 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (23 January 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The same report — the board assurance report of 23 January 2025 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.

ERO and the board have identified the following area of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

the requirement to complete necessary safety checks for an employee. [Children’s Act 2014; Children’s (Requirements for Safety Checks of Children’s Workers) Regulations 2015].

The board has since taken steps to address the area of non-compliance identified.

Read this board assurance report on ero.govt.nz →

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 23 January 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Opotiki School provides education for students in Years 1 to 8. The school shares strong links to Te Whakatōhea Iwi , and neighbouring iwi: Tuhoe, Te Whānau-ā-Apanui, Ngāitai and Ngāti Awa . The school motto ‘ Manaakitia-ō-Pōtiki ’ which means ‘To care for and nurture our children’ was gifted by local Māori .

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous report in July 2022, ERO and the school have worked together to evaluate how well schoolwide practices promote maximum opportunity for all learners to learn and achieve improved outcomes, particularly in mathematics.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

Improvement in consistent and coherent teaching and learning across the school.

A structured mathematics approach has been implemented schoolwide resulting in improved consistency of teaching and learning across the school.

Sufficient and equitable opportunities for learners to achieve at their appropriate curriculum level.

Learner outcomes in mathematics have improved, with increasingly effective transitions for learners between year levels.

The majority of learners are now progressing and achieving at or above their expected curriculum level in mathematics.

Other Findings

During the course of the evaluation, it was found that the school has embedded systems and processes for supporting learner wellbeing and inclusion, particularly for those requiring more individual support.

Collaborative monitoring of learner progress and achievement is strengthening, leading to increased consistency of teaching and learning in response to learner needs.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Outcomes for learners are becoming more equitable and excellent.

A large majority of learners achieve at or above curriculum level expectations in mathematics; a smaller majority of learners achieve at or above expected levels in reading and writing.

Accelerated progress in mathematics is evident for many learners; priority remains to improve outcomes for all learners not yet achieving their expected curriculum levels in reading, writing and mathematics.

Less than half of all learners attend school regularly, however, the rate of regular attendance has improved in 2024; the school continues to work towards meeting the Ministry of Education attendance target.

Conditions to support learner success

Leaders consistently foster a culture of collaboration and relational trust that is committed to high quality teaching and equity in learner outcomes.

Leaders increasingly support and promote leadership opportunities for teachers, building expertise and capability within the school.

Established expectations for high quality teaching and learning are shared and monitored; this has increased consistency of planning and curriculum implementation across the school.

Leaders have established collaborative networks and learning programmes to increase opportunities for learning and success, particularly for those learners requiring additional support.

Teaching is progressively responsive to the differing needs of learners.

Structured literacy and mathematics teaching practices enable improved progress for learners in reading, writing and mathematics.

Respectful and collaborative teacher-learner relationships support an inclusive environment and increasingly promote student engagement in learning.

Strengthened processes for teachers to collectively monitor learner progress and achievement has led to improved consistency in responsive planning to meet learner needs.

Learners needing additional support are identified and provided with increasingly effective assistance that progresses their learning.

School conditions that underpin ongoing school improvement have strengthened.

Leaders and teachers provide regular opportunities for parents, whānau and iwi to share aspirations for learners and to engage in school life; information is increasingly used to inform school priorities.

Inclusion and wellbeing are prioritised; staff actively engage with whānau to improve attendance and learning outcomes.

Teachers and leaders have improved their use of assessment information to respond more effectively to learner needs; this remains a focus to support ongoing improvement.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

improve outcomes for all learners in reading, writing and mathematics, with a particular focus on accelerated progress for those not yet meeting curriculum expectations

embed and sustain schoolwide consistency for planning and implementation of the structured mathematics and literacy

consolidate and strengthen processes, including the effective use of assessment practices, for teachers and leaders to regularly monitor and evaluate the impact of teaching and learning on learner progress and achievement

monitor and review strategies to improve rates of regular attendance for all learners.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within six months:

identify teachers' strengths and development needs in assessment practices to inform professional learning requirements

develop improvement plans for literacy and mathematics that include monitoring and evaluating student progress and next steps for continued improvement

review and strengthen processes to collectively monitor the impact of teaching, learning and use of assessment information on learner progress and achievement

Every six months:

monitor the levels of accelerated progress for learners identified as not yet achieving expected outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics to inform actions for continued progress

scrutinise how well assessment information is used to monitor learner progress and to guide responsive teaching and learning in reading, writing and mathematics

monitor and report on the impact of strategies used to improve learner attendance

Annually:

evaluate learner progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics, with a particular focus on improved equity and accelerated progress for learners not achieving at expected curriculum levels; use this information to support ongoing improvement priorities

analyse how well teachers and leaders are using assessment information to effectively respond to learner needs; use these findings to clarify strengths and areas for improvement

evaluate schoolwide consistency in the planning and implementation of structured mathematics and literacy learning programmes, to support sustainability of practice and positive learning outcomes

analyse and report on patterns and improvements in attendance, to inform ongoing improvement priorities.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

improved rates of regular attendance and increased engagement, achievement and equitable outcomes for all learners in literacy and mathematics

strengthened processes for effective monitoring and evaluation of the impact of teaching and learning on learners’ progress and achievement

embedded systems and processes for gathering and using assessment information to guide schoolwide improvement priorities and supporting actions.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children.

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

23 January 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 4 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).