KuraHub

← Back to search

Mornington School

Contributing · State

Year levels
1–6
Total roll
239
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 146 schools in Otago Region with a published location. Mornington School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
34 Elgin Road, Mornington, Dunedin
Territorial authority
Dunedin City
Phone
03-4536794
Email
office@mornington.school.nz
Website
http://www.mornington.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Dunedin · schools in Otago

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

Uniform
  • RequiredThe wearing of the Mornington School uniform is a condition of enrolment.

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
156
Māori
38
Pacific
18
Asian
51
MELAA
14
Other
9
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 014451119030
Year 029234331044
Year 0330122026038
Year 0450114226041
Year 058391226040
Year 066110223027
Year 07401208011
Total39104214101590231
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 054451119030
Age 069234330043
Age 0730111026036
Age 0850113127040
Age 0983103325043
Age 106110222026
Age 114012010013
Total39104214101590231

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

20.1%

Mornington School20.1%
Otago Region36.8%
Contributing35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male38.6%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā27.9%
Total20.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Mornington School0%
Otago Region4.6%
Contributing3.5%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Mornington School0%
Otago Region2%
Contributing1.5%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
439
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Major urban area
Date opened
9 July 1865

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
7
Last reviewed
27 February 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (27 February 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 27 February 2025 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 239 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. June 2017

    263

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 21 September 2017

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 27 February 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa .

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Mornington School is located in the hill suburbs of Dunedin. The school provides education for students in Years 1 to 6. Their mission states: Noho Tahi, Ako Tahi – Together we live and learn .

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous ERO report of November 2022, ERO and the school have worked together to evaluate the impact of the ‘Developing Mathematical Inquiry Communities’ (DMIC) approach on teacher practice, curriculum and student learning outcomes

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see increasingly consistent and effective teacher practice, leading to improved learning outcomes for all students in mathematics, and particularly for priority students.

Progress rates in mathematics have accelerated for some learners; outcomes for groups of learners are not yet equitable.

The school has adopted a coherent approach to teaching mathematics across the school.

Teachers now use a range of information to plan for anticipated learning outcomes in mathematics and adapt their teaching in response to learners’ needs.

Teachers and leaders work collaboratively and deliberately to inquire into aspects of their teaching practice to support learner progress and achievement in mathematics.

Leaders are developing appropriate assessment practices for mathematics; assessment tools increasingly respond to learners’ needs, providing timely individual, class and whole-school insights into learner progress rates.

Other Findings

The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s action is the growth in teachers’ knowledge about how learners think mathematically and learn new mathematical concepts. Teachers are increasingly using this knowledge to notice and respond to learners’ needs in mathematics lessons.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

The school is working towards excellent and equitable outcomes for learners.

The majority of learners achieve curriculum expectations in reading, writing and mathematics.

Achievement outcomes show inequity for groups of learners in reading, writing and mathematics.

The majority of students attend school regularly; the school is not yet meeting the Ministry of Education target for attendance rates.

Conditions to support learner success

Leadership is building a culture committed to high-quality teaching and learning.

Leadership ensures planning, coordination and evaluation of the school’s curriculum and teaching is well considered; expectations for high-quality teaching are clear, shared and monitored.

Leaders use relevant internal and external expertise to strengthen teaching capability across the school; professional learning is well aligned with the school’s strategic goals.

Leaders are strengthening the ways they collect and interpret data; evaluation capability is growing across the school to better inform decision-making for continuous improvement.

Teaching is increasingly responsive to the needs of learners.

Leaders and teachers take shared responsibility for learner outcomes and work collectively to support learner engagement, progress and achievement.

Teachers use evidence-based teaching strategies, including mixed ability grouping to provide purposeful and well-paced learning opportunities.

Teachers scaffold learning and use their knowledge of learners’ strengths and needs to target additional support to those who require it.

Key conditions that underpin successful schooling are embedding.

Teachers increasingly use a range of culturally responsive practices to engage learners in learning.

The school provides a wide range of support and resources to parents and whānau so they can assist their child’s learning, including holiday programmes.

Leaders are strengthening policies, programmes and practices to promote learners’ wellbeing, inclusion and engagement in learning.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are:

evaluate the effectiveness of strategies used to improve students’ regular attendance

strengthen teaching practice to accelerate progress and improve equitable outcomes for groups of learners

evaluate targeted interventions to know their impact on outcomes for learners and use this information to support increasingly excellent and equitable outcomes.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within three months:

leaders and teachers review current strategies used to raise attendance to identify what is working well and what might be improved

engage with parents and whānau to develop and implement a plan to bring about improvements to regular attendance

identify effective practice in literacy teaching; use this to enhance strategies for responding to learners’ needs, particularly for those who require accelerated progress

ensure targeted interventions have appropriate measures of success that focus on outcome for learners

Every six months:

evaluate the effectiveness of strategies used to improve attendance and make changes where needed

leaders continue to report to the board on student progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics to show the impact of planned actions for increasingly excellent and equitable outcomes

Annually:

report to the board on improvements in rates of regular attendance and prioritise next steps accordingly

leaders report to the board student wellbeing, engagement, progress and achievement data to inform responsive decision making for continuous improvement.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

more students attending regularly

increasingly excellent and equitable learning outcomes for all students

teaching practice that is highly responsive and focuses on the progress of those learners at risk of underachievement.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

27 February 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 7 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).