KuraHub

← Back to search

Mangakahia Area School

Composite · State

Year levels
not reported
Total roll
80
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 155 schools in Northland Region with a published location. Mangakahia Area School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
1480 Mangakahia Road, Titoki, Whangarei
Territorial authority
Whangarei District
Phone
09-4331702
Email
admin@mangakahia.school.nz
Website
http://www.mangakahia.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Whangārei · schools in Northland

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
37
Māori
67
Pacific
9
Asian
0
MELAA
0
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0130000203
Year 0240000004
Year 0340000104
Year 0450000105
Year 0540000004
Year 0671000207
Year 0730000003
Year 0850000105
Year 091300003013
Year 1072000409
Year 1160000307
Year 12910004010
Year 13+40000104
Total74400022078
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 0530000203
Age 0640000004
Age 0730000103
Age 0860000106
Age 0940000004
Age 1071000207
Age 1130000003
Age 1250000105
Age 131000003010
Age 14910002010
Age 15910006011
Age 1671000308
Age 1720000102
Age 1810000001
Age 19+10000001
Total74400022078

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Academic results

Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025

62.5%

Mangakahia Area School62.5%
Northland Region82.3%
Composite (Year 1-15)91.4%
State: Not integrated83.6%
New Zealand85.2%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificNot applicable
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total62.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025

62.5%

Mangakahia Area School62.5%
Northland Region72.1%
Composite (Year 1-15)86%
State: Not integrated75.4%
New Zealand77.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificNot applicable
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total62.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025

25%

Mangakahia Area School25%
Northland Region48.3%
Composite (Year 1-15)71.7%
State: Not integrated55.2%
New Zealand59%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificNot applicable
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total25%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with VP Award — 2025

0%

Mangakahia Area School0%
Northland Region16.8%
Composite (Year 1-15)16%
State: Not integrated14.4%
New Zealand14.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificNot applicable
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)

Retention

Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025

62.5%

Mangakahia Area School62.5%
Northland Region72.9%
Composite (Year 1-15)86.6%
State: Not integrated81.4%
New Zealand83%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificNot applicable
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total62.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

86.7%

Mangakahia Area School86.7%
Northland Region52%
Composite (Year 1-15)26.5%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female21.5%
Male152.6%
Māori89.4%
Pacific0%
AsianNot available (source marker: "nd")
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā74.1%
Total86.7%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Mangakahia Area School0%
Northland Region6.5%
Composite (Year 1-15)3.2%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
AsianNot available (source marker: "nd")
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Mangakahia Area School0%
Northland Region2.7%
Composite (Year 1-15)1.2%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
AsianNot available (source marker: "nd")
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
560
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Rural other
Date opened
25 January 1907

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
4
Last reviewed
6 May 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (6 May 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The same report — the board assurance report of 6 May 2025 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.

ERO has identified the following area of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

ensure that high risk activities are clearly identified in education outside the classroom (EOTC) approvals prior to board sign off. [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015]

The board has since taken steps to address the area of non-compliance identified.

Read this board assurance report on ero.govt.nz →

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 80 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. April 2019

    90

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 30 May 2019

  2. August 2017

    73

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 29 November 2017

We draw no line between these. Each was counted for its own report, years apart, by a different review team, and a roll moves between reviews for reasons none of these figures record — so the difference between any two of them measures nothing.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 6 May 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Mangakahia Area School is in the small rural town of Titoki , southwest of Whāngarei. The school provides education for students from Years 1 to 13. In 2024 the school roll was 75 students. The board appointed a permanent principal in 2024.

There are two parts to this report.

Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Improvements are required to ensure all learners are engaged, make progress and achieve well.

A small majority of learners in Years 1 to 6 achieve at expected curriculum levels in mathematics; in Years 7 to 10, mathematics achievement is less than a third.

Less than half of learners in Years 1 to 10 achieve at expected curriculum levels in reading and writing.

National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) information shows an increase in attainment over the last three years; a small majority of learners achieve NCEA Level 1 and 2, and a large majority achieve NCEA Level 3.

Learners are proud of their school; they speak positively about the way staff value and affirm their identity, language and culture, enhancing their wellbeing.

Less than a third of students attend school regularly; however, regular attendance is improving towards the Government’s target and leaders and the board are actively taking steps to develop strategies that increase attendance.

Conditions to support learner success

Leaders are taking steps to foster a professional culture of continuous improvement and increase learner engagement and achievement.

Leadership is effectively guiding the school through a period of change that is focused on strengthening high quality teaching and learning.

Leaders set and implement clear strategic goals that aim to support a responsive curriculum and improve learner outcomes.

Senior leaders build good relational trust among staff that ensures positive and clear communication and collaboration for planning and teaching.

The school is taking steps to provide a responsive curriculum and high-quality teaching practice.

Students experience culturally responsive and inclusive learning environments that foster positive and respectful relationships amongst students and with staff.

Teachers are developing their use of assessment practices and student achievement information to consistently inform planning and teaching.

Teachers adapt learning programmes, using practices tailored to the individual, that increasingly support learner engagement, particularly for those at risk of not achieving.

School conditions that support learner success are being established.

The board represents and works with the community to develop the school’s vision, values and strategic direction.

Staff and students recognise and value external educational partnerships that enrich teaching and learning opportunities.

Leaders and some teachers are beginning to collect, analyse and interpret student engagement and achievement information to make evidence-based decisions for schoolwide improvement actions.

Professional learning opportunities for teachers increasingly align to improvement goals and learner needs, particularly for those learners most at risk of not achieving.

Part B: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

implement strategies and initiatives to improve students’ regular attendance

further develop and implement the school curriculum, integrating the new literacy and mathematics requirements schoolwide to increase student progress and achievement

strengthen schoolwide teaching, learning and assessment practices through the staff professional growth cycle to ensure consistency of approaches and the effective use of student achievement information to inform ongoing planning and teaching.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within three months:

review the school’s current attendance actions and implement a plan to increase regular attendance

Within six months:

review structured literacy and mathematics approaches schoolwide and provide relevant staff professional learning that strengthens teachers’ understanding and use of highly effective teaching, learning and assessment practices

collate and analyse feedback from staff about the professional growth cycle to support its ongoing implementation and impact on practice and learner outcomes

Every six months:

review the impact of the plan to improve students’ regular attendance and identify next steps

review progress made with implementing the school curriculum, including the literacy and mathematics requirements, to support future planning and action

Annually:

review and report to the board on student attendance, progress and achievement information to inform ongoing strategic decision making and planning

evaluate the impact of teaching, learning and assessment practices on students’ engagement, progress and achievement and use this to support next steps.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

increased regular attendance for all learners

improved progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics and more students achieving NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3

effective use of assessment practices and achievement information schoolwide that support consistent high-quality teaching and learning.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Sharon Kelly Director of Schools (Acting)

6 May 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 4 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).