KuraHub

← Back to search

Lyttelton Primary School

Full Primary · State

Year levels
1–8
Total roll
130
Enrolment zone
Yes
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 293 schools in Canterbury Region with a published location. Lyttelton Primary School is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
34 Oxford Street, Lyttelton
Territorial authority
Christchurch City
Phone
03-9290588
Email
office@lyttelton.school.nz
Website
http://www.lyttelton.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Christchurch · schools in Canterbury

Can my child go here?

This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work

Loading zone map…

Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.

Check if your address is in zone →

Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

How to enrol

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
125
Māori
13
Pacific
0
Asian
5
MELAA
1
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 012010013013
Year 022100018018
Year 033110016017
Year 043021119020
Year 0500210809
Year 064000021021
Year 076010019023
Year 082011020022
Total2228311340143
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 052010011011
Age 062100019019
Age 072110016017
Age 083020117017
Age 091022011013
Age 104000021021
Age 116010019023
Age 122011018020
Age 1300000202
Total2228311340143

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

58.3%

Lyttelton Primary School58.3%
Canterbury Region38.3%
Full Primary35.6%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male118.2%
Māori179.1%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā65.4%
Total58.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

12.3%

Lyttelton Primary School12.3%
Canterbury Region3.7%
Full Primary3.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male24.7%
Māori66.8%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā13.9%
Total12.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

12.4%

Lyttelton Primary School12.4%
Canterbury Region1.7%
Full Primary1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male24.9%
Māori65.3%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā14%
Total12.4%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
424
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Small urban area
Date opened
4 May 2014

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
5
Last reviewed
24 January 2025
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (24 January 2025)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 24 January 2025 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 130 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. July 2017

    207

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 26 September 2017

This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 24 January 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Context

Lyttelton Primary School located in Lyttelton, Christchurch, provides education for students in Years 1 to 8. The school’s vision is Thriving Today — Ready for Tomorrow and underpins the curriculum.

There are three parts to this report.

Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.

Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.

Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.

Part A: Previous Improvement Goals

Since the previous ERO report in September 2022, the school and ERO have worked together to evaluate how effectively the literacy programmes ensured equity and excellence for all learners.

Expected Improvements and Findings

The school expected to see:

Improved outcomes for learners in literacy.

Positive student outcomes in reading have been sustained, there has been small gains made in writing; this remains a priority.

Outcomes for Māori students have shown a significant improvement in both reading and writing; increasing equity for Māori students is evident, this remains a priority.

A research informed approach to the teaching and learning in literacy.

Teachers and leaders took part in a range of effective professional development based on the science of reading and writing; this is now embedded into their practice and has strengthened teacher capability in teaching literacy.

Other Findings

The greatest shift that occurred in literacy learning following the introduction of the structured approach, was the improved engagement of students.

Part B: Current State

The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.

Learner Success and Wellbeing

Students are engaged, make good progress and achieve well.

Most students achieve at or above curriculum level expectations in reading and mathematics, and the majority achieve these expectations in writing.

Improving equity for groups of students’ achievement remains a priority, including for Māori students in reading and mathematics, boys in writing and girls in mathematics.

A small majority of students attend school regularly; the school is yet to achieve the Ministry of Education 2024 attendance target.

Conditions to support learner success

Strategic leadership works collaboratively to improve outcomes for learners.

Leaders set evidence-based targets and use effective interventions to facilitate ongoing innovation, improvement and development of teacher capabilities for high quality teaching and learning.

Leaders analyse and systematically monitor schoolwide progress and achievement information; learners at risk of underachievement are identified and plans developed to respond to their needs.

Leadership fosters a highly collaborative team culture; the staff are responsive, flexible and open to new approaches to improve learner success and wellbeing.

Teaching is highly responsive to the many different needs of learners.

Teachers use comprehensive guidelines for curriculum delivery; this supports consistent and cohesive practices across the school support learner wellbeing and engagement.

Teachers and leaders know students well and implement learning programmes deliberately aligned to individual student needs and interests; this enhances engagement in learning.

Teachers use assessment activities that are inclusive, relate to the real world and fit-for-purpose; they provide meaningful evidence of progress and achievement as a basis for determining next steps for learning.

Key organisational conditions that support learner success are well embedded.

Leaders use strong consultation processes to gather community aspirations and inform the development of strategic priorities for improvement.

Teachers and leaders systematically gather and analyse student wellbeing information and have meaningful partnerships with a wide range of external agencies; this enhances student wellbeing and achievement outcomes.

Leaders and teachers use well embedded evaluation processes to determine the effectiveness of interventions and initiatives and to inquire into teaching practices; this informs planning for improvement.

Student achievement and engagement is enhanced through meaningful teaching and learning that increasingly includes te reo Māori, tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori.

Part C: Where to next?

The agreed next steps for the school are to:

continue to strengthen teaching practice to accelerate achievement and improve equitable outcomes for Māori students in reading, writing and mathematics, boys in writing and girls in mathematics

strengthen strategies and initiatives to improve students’ regular attendance.

The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.

Within three months:

leaders and teachers review current strategies for addressing attendance concerns to identify what is working and what is not

Every six months:

take deliberate action in response to emerging data trends, with particular attention to those learners at risk of not achieving and those with lower rates of regular attendance

identify effective practices in literacy and numeracy teaching and use this to extend strategies for responding to learner needs

Annually:

continue to use and report student progress and achievement data to inform responsive decision making and effective strategies for improving attendance, teaching and learning

evaluate the impact of initiatives for continued improvements in achievement and attendance.

Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:

improved equity in reading, writing and mathematics between groups of students; particularly for Māori students, boys in writing and girls in mathematics

increasingly excellent outcomes in writing

increased student engagement in learning and more students attending regularly.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

24 January 2025

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 5 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).