Ilam School
Contributing · State
- Year levels
- 1–6
- Total roll
- 378
- Enrolment zone
- Yes
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 66 Ilam Road, Ilam, Christchurch
- Territorial authority
- Christchurch City
- Phone
- 03-3487492
- admin@ilam.school.nz
- Website
- http://www.ilam.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Christchurch · schools in Canterbury
Can my child go here?
This school has an enrolment scheme, so a place is not open to every address. How enrolment zones work
Loading zone map…
Zone boundaries shown here are approximate. Ministry of Education data warns these boundaries do not have high spatial precision and can place neighbouring addresses on different sides of a line. This is not a confirmation of enrolment eligibility — always confirm directly with the school. Zone geometry also does not reflect enrolment priority rules (siblings, special character categories, ballots) — it shows the mapped boundary only.
Check if your address is in zone →
Source: Ministry of Education, CC BY 3.0 NZ
What would the day look like?
The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- Uniform
Not stated on the school’s website.
- Where to buy the uniform
- https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz/c/schools/ilam-school?sr=ilam%20school
The uniform is available from [The Warehouse](https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz/c/schools/ilam-school?sr=ilam%20school)[Mainland Uniforms](https://www.mainlanduniforms.nz/20-ilam-school-ilam-store)
- https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz/c/schools/ilam-school?sr=ilam%20school
What does the school say about itself?
Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- In their words
- Our four values are being:
- Respectful kia whakaute
- Kind kia aroha
- Positive kia pono
- Safe kia haumaru
- International students
- Accepted, as stated
After we receive your documentation and approve your application we will issue you with an international student fees invoice.
- Accepted, as stated
What is on offer beyond the classroom?
The sports, arts, clubs and groups this school names on its own website. Not a complete list of what any school offers, and not a count — a school that names more here has written more down, which is not the same as doing more.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- On offer
- kapa haka
We are fortunate at Ilam School to have a skilled kapa haka tutor who works throughout the year with the student group, which performs at assemblies and special occasions.
- Athletics
- Athletics
- Cricket
- Cricket
- Cross country
- Cross country
- Football (soccer)
- Football (soccer)
- Hockey
- Hockey
- Netball
- Netball
- Swimming
- Swimming
- Table tennis
- Table tennis
- kapa haka
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 120
- Māori
- 20
- Pacific
- 19
- Asian
- 214
- MELAA
- 38
- Other
- 4
- International
- 9
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 4 | 0 | 37 | 15 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 65 |
| Year 02 | 6 | 3 | 28 | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 57 |
| Year 03 | 6 | 3 | 35 | 6 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 68 |
| Year 04 | 4 | 3 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 2 | 63 |
| Year 05 | 6 | 3 | 34 | 6 | 2 | 20 | 2 | 65 |
| Year 06 | 5 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 3 | 24 | 2 | 77 |
| Year 07 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Total | 32 | 17 | 208 | 49 | 12 | 125 | 7 | 403 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 14 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 50 |
| Age 06 | 6 | 2 | 29 | 6 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 52 |
| Age 07 | 7 | 3 | 33 | 10 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 67 |
| Age 08 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 2 | 72 |
| Age 09 | 7 | 4 | 33 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 65 |
| Age 10 | 4 | 3 | 42 | 6 | 2 | 22 | 3 | 76 |
| Age 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 20 |
| Age 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 17 | 208 | 49 | 12 | 125 | 7 | 403 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Ilam School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 38.3% |
| Contributing | 35.6% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Ilam School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 3.7% |
| Contributing | 3.5% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Ilam School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 1.7% |
| Contributing | 1.5% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 394
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Major urban area
- Date opened
- 25 January 1950
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 6
- Last reviewed
- 5 August 2024
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (5 August 2024)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The board assurance report of 5 August 2024 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 5 August 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa .
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Ilam School is situated in Christchurch and provides education for students from Years 1 to 6. There has been a change of senior leadership and board since the 2021 ERO report.
The school’s strategic plan prioritises turangawaewae , our place; ako , our learning and whanaungatanga , our culture and relationships.
There are three parts to this report.
Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.
Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction.
Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Previous Improvement Goals
During the past three years, ERO and the school have been working together to evaluate how the development of a consistent and responsive approach to teaching and learning in mathematics, through collaborative inquiry, ensures learners experience hauora , wellbeing and success.
Expected Improvements and Findings
The school expected to see:
Students, staff and families engaging together to collectively enhance learning practices and outcomes.
The majority of students achieve well in mathematics, including English language learners.
Ongoing and collaborative professional development has improved the quality of mathematics teaching to be more responsive to students’ strengths and needs.
The school has implemented a range of opportunities for whānau and family to meet and discuss developments in curriculum and learning and these continue to expand through digital platforms.
Staff responding to students’ strengths and needs, including responsive practices and relationships in teaching and learning approaches.
Students benefit from teaching and learning in mathematics that is research-informed and personalised to interests, strengths and needs.
An experienced language support team provides experienced assistance to English language learners and their families and shares its expertise with teaching teams, fostering collective support for diverse cultures.
Leaders have created a common language and expectations for high quality teaching and learning in mathematics, with coherent assessment, planning and practices, and improved data analysis.
Energised and confident teachers, fostering student hauora and success.
Students express greater engagement, confidence and understanding in mathematics, and their achievements are celebrated.
Teachers collaboratively identify evidence for improved achievement in mathematics and collectively seek solutions to further enhance students’ confidence and success in mathematics.
Other Findings
During the evaluation leaders realised that prioritising one focus for development across the school with associated training to grow middle leadership and having senior leaders participating in the professional development, effectively promoted capability-building.
The greatest shift that occurred in response to the school’s action, was a culture of innovation and research-informed practice. Teachers naturally transferred their learning from mathematics into other areas of the curriculum, initiating spontaneous reviews and improvements in practice.
Part B: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
Improved learner outcomes are successfully sustained, with a strong focus on accelerated progress.
The school’s analysis of reading, writing and mathematics data shows that the majority of students achieve at or above curriculum expectations, including for most Māori students.
The school’s analysis of data shows that Pacific students’ attendance, progress and achievement is an area for continued focus and is being addressed through the school’s Pacific Plan.
The school has strong overall attendance at 90%, leaders deeply analyse the data to identify trends in absences and opportunities to further strengthen regular attendance for some students.
Conditions to support learner success
Leadership effectively uses evidence-based evaluation to improve learner outcomes, aligning systems, structures and practices to sustain learner success.
Senior leaders have instigated systematic improvements to grow team leadership and teaching practices, designed to strengthen student achievement in the core learning areas.
Team leaders effectively support staff to realise the school’s vision with a shared understanding of common practices, that foster professional growth and supportive relationships.
Regular staff discussions are focused on learner success, sharing professional readings and research, monitoring progress and providing a collaborative forum to evaluate benefits for students.
Curriculum design and implementation are explicit and align strongly with embedded vision and values.
Teachers provide learners with and increasingly responsive, student-centred and localised curriculum that promotes their engagement in learning.
The curriculum clearly outlines expectations for quality teaching that values diverse potential, seeks students’ ideas, and guides enhanced teaching and learning practices.
Leaders have created a progressive mathematics pathway from Years 1 to 6, to sustain improved student achievement, wellbeing and engagement over time.
Parents and whānau are respected partners in learning, and the board and leaders are increasingly involving whānau, hapū and iwi in curriculum and strategic developments.
Community consultation informed the principal’s appointment and strategic review, and the strategic plan prioritises further opportunities to engage with whānau, hapū and iwi voices in deliberate ways.
A well organised learning support provision for students with specialist needs will benefit from student and family voice and perspectives being more explicitly woven through planning and review.
The school has joined a Kāhui Ako , benefitting from new professional partnerships and greater community connections to set shared wellbeing, attendance and learning goals with local schools.
Part C: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
continue to develop and embed the school’s Pacific education plan with families and staff to raise attendance, progress, and achievement for students from Pacific communities
initiate formalised wellbeing surveys and further interrogate achievement data to compare boys’ and girls’ achievement, further strengthening evidence-based planning and teaching decisions
replicate the success of the mathematics developments by creating a progressive structured literacy approach across the school
engage with whānau, hapū and iwi in the school’s increasing integration of te reo Māori, tikanga , and mātauranga Māori through the curriculum.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows:
Within six months:
re-introduce a formal wellbeing survey to complement existing methods of gathering student feedback
further refine individual education plans to reflect student and families’ perspectives
meet purposefully with Pacific families to discuss and refine the school’s Pacific plan
Every six months:
evaluate mid-year and end-of-year progress, identifying opportunities to enhance student outcomes
continue to build evidence-based teaching and learning using a collaborative inquiry approach
provide varied opportunities for hui and family meetings that will inform the school’s decision making
Annually:
systematically use data to evaluate, refine and monitor the impact of professional development on literacy teaching practices, and sustaining improved student outcomes
report to the board and community on curriculum developments, increasingly incorporating whānau and iwi perspectives
implement the board’s formalised evaluation of its effectiveness, using the Hautu review tool.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
equitable Pacific learner success and engagement
sustained improvements in mathematics
the design of effective and progressive structured literacy approaches
inclusive education and Te Tiriti o Waitangi overtly woven through curriculum and culture.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Shelley Booysen Director of Schools
5 August 2024
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 6 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).