KuraHub

← Back to search

Huntly College

Secondary (Year 9-15) · State

Year levels
9–13
Total roll
200
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 305 schools in Waikato Region with a published location. Huntly College is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
Bridge Street, Huntly
Territorial authority
Waikato District
Phone
07-8287152
Email
admin@huntlycollege.school.nz
Website
http://www.huntlycollege.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Waikato

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
59
Māori
149
Pacific
31
Asian
27
MELAA
3
Other
3
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0929900010035
Year 1041732115049
Year 1132850219041
Year 1226640011036
Year 13+816003013
Total136311823580174
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 1210000001
Age 1326800010031
Age 1437842112045
Age 1534530217041
Age 1626820013036
Age 171225006016
Age 1800300003
Age 19+00100001
Total136311823580174

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Academic results

Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025

31.3%

Huntly College31.3%
Waikato Region84.2%
Secondary (Year 9-15)88%
State: Not integrated83.6%
New Zealand85.2%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female34.8%
Male28%
Māori25%
PacificToo few to report
AsianToo few to report
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/Pākehā17.6%
Total31.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025

22.9%

Huntly College22.9%
Waikato Region75.7%
Secondary (Year 9-15)81%
State: Not integrated75.4%
New Zealand77.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female30.4%
Male16%
Māori15%
PacificToo few to report
AsianToo few to report
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/Pākehā17.6%
Total22.9%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025

14.6%

Huntly College14.6%
Waikato Region51.3%
Secondary (Year 9-15)61.8%
State: Not integrated55.2%
New Zealand59%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female17.4%
Male12%
Māori10%
PacificToo few to report
AsianToo few to report
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/Pākehā5.9%
Total14.6%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with VP Award — 2025

2.1%

Huntly College2.1%
Waikato Region15.1%
Secondary (Year 9-15)15.2%
State: Not integrated14.4%
New Zealand14.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female4.3%
Male0%
Māori0%
PacificToo few to report
AsianToo few to report
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/Pākehā0%
Total2.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)

Retention

Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025

33.3%

Huntly College33.3%
Waikato Region77.4%
Secondary (Year 9-15)83.5%
State: Not integrated81.4%
New Zealand83%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female30.4%
Male36%
Māori32.5%
PacificToo few to report
AsianToo few to report
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/Pākehā35.3%
Total33.3%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

52%

Huntly College52%
Waikato Region53.9%
Secondary (Year 9-15)35.8%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female72.8%
Male37%
Māori63.6%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā47%
Total52%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

2.5%

Huntly College2.5%
Waikato Region6.6%
Secondary (Year 9-15)4%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female6%
Male0%
Māori3.1%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total2.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Huntly College0%
Waikato Region2.4%
Secondary (Year 9-15)1.7%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
552
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Small urban area
Date opened
25 January 1953

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
4
Last reviewed
15 January 2026
Latest report
School Evaluation Report
Report type
Evaluation report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (15 January 2026)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 15 January 2026 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

What this report states about the school

As stated in ERO’s report of 15 January 2026 — not necessarily the position now. Each line quotes the sentence it came from.

Year levels
  • Years 9 to 13It provides education for students in Years 9 to 13

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 15 January 2026 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Evaluation Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Every New Zealand state and state integrated school has an ERO review at least once every four years to evaluate what is working well for learners and what needs to be improved.

About the school

Huntly College is located in Rāhui Pōkeka (Huntly) which is described as the heart of the Kīngitanga movement. It provides education for students in Years 9 to 13. The school is guided by its core values of whanaungatanga (relationships), manaakitanga (care), kaitiakitanga (respect), and rangatiratanga (leadership ). Huntly College is located in Rāhui Pōkeka (Huntly) which is described as the heart of the Kīngitanga movement.

A Ministry of Education Specialist Advisor, initiated by the board, started working with the school in June 2025.

Education Counts provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement, school enrolments and school zones. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

An explanation of the terms and judgements used in this report can be found here: Reporting | Education Review Office

Improvement and progress

This section is about the progress the school has made since the March 2024 ERO report. It includes an explanation of the expected improvements and findings.

Expected improvements

Huntly College evaluated the effectiveness of its attendance plan and processes on promoting regular attendance and improving learner outcomes, including how the schools’ partnerships with whānau and the wider community help reduce barriers and enhance learner success.

Findings

The school has made some progress in improving regular attendance. Leaders are working to develop and implement robust attendance policies and processes. Strengthening partnerships with whānau and the community remains a key focus, with targeted actions and a new strategic plan aimed at enhancing engagement and reducing barriers to learning.

What we know about learner success

This section provides a summary of learner success, wellbeing and foundation school conditions, including any education in Rumaki/Reo Rua settings. The judgments are based on the ERO School Improvement Framework and evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.

Less than a third Less than half Small majority Large majority Most Almost all

0 to 33% 34 to 49% 50 to 64% 65 to 79% 80 to 90% Over 90%

Learner success and wellbeing

This section provides a summary of learner success and wellbeing.

Significant improvements are required to ensure all learners are attending regularly, making sufficient progress and achieving well.

In 2024, less than a third of students achieve National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) at Level 2, 3 and less than a third of students achieve University Entrance (UE). A large majority of students achieve literacy and numeracy by the end of NCEA Level 3.

By the end of Year 10, less than a third of students are achieving at or above the expected curriculum level. Results are not yet equitable for all groups of students.

Less than a third of students attend school regularly. Improving student achievement and regular attendance is a key priority for school leaders.

Conditions to support learner success

This section provides a summary of leadership, teaching, curriculum and foundation school conditions for improvement.

Leadership is taking steps to develop systems and processes that improve outcomes for learners.

The Huntly College School Board and school leaders have begun working to address the key priority areas for improvement identified in this report.

Prioritising the development and embedding of strategic and annual planning is essential to effectively guide school improvement.

Leaders recently developed a consistent approach to classroom observations to strengthen consistency of teaching practice and improve learner outcomes. This remains a key priority for improvement.

Improving the quality and consistency of teaching and learning across the school is critical to increasing student achievement and remains a key priority for improvement.

Leaders prioritise working with staff to establish a culture of high expectations, aiming to enhance student success, improve attendance, and ensure equitable access to meaningful learning and pathways.

School leaders are beginning to use achievement data to inform decision making and guide improvement planning.

Professional learning has focused on accelerating achievement for Years 9 and 10 in literacy and mathematics. Initial data indicates that this has had a positive impact. Extending this focus to NCEA achievement to improve outcomes for all learners is a priority.

Schoolwide systems require greater coherence and strengthening to drive sustained improvement.

School leaders are reviewing, developing and implementing policies and procedures to strengthen school-wide systems that support coherent and sustained improvement.

Systems and processes for identifying, tracking, and monitoring students with additional learning needs are being developed to ensure the provision of high-quality learning support and improved outcomes for these learners.

Leadership and the board are beginning to actively engage with whānau, hapū and iwi; the school recognises this as a next step to enhance learning partnerships.

Student feedback is increasingly gathered and responded to, with initial steps taken to use it to inform decisions around curriculum design and cultural opportunities.

Next steps for improvement

This section provides more detail for the school to include in its strategic and annual planning for ongoing improvement across the school. It identifies key priorities and actions for improvement.

Key priorities

Strengthen leadership capability to bring about improvement and sustain effective school-wide systems and processes including: strengthen systems and strategies to improve student attendance, ensuring consistent monitoring and targeted responses to address barriers improving processes for the collection, analysis, and use of assessment data to inform teaching, track progress, and support equitable outcomes for all learners development of strategic and annual planning that explicitly prioritise school-wide improvement and improving student outcomes building teacher capability and promote consistency of effective teaching practice across the school enhance curriculum and timetable design to provide rich learning opportunities and strengthen access to meaningful pathways that support student engagement.

Actions to bring about improvement

Within three months:

school leaders and the Board develop and implement an effective attendance plan and procedures

leaders and the Board identify leadership needs and plan for development to support delivery of improvement plans in line with strategic and government targets

school leaders and the Board strengthen strategic and annual planning to prioritise improvement in student outcomes

leaders and teachers develop an effective teacher profile and implement a teacher observation framework that ensures consistency of practice across the school

leaders and teachers review the curriculum, course and timetable design to determine where additional enriching learning opportunities could be included

Within six months:

school leaders and the Board review the attendance plan and procedures, identify areas for further improvement and plan next steps

school leaders review the impact of leadership on outcomes and identify areas for further development

leaders and teachers start implementing additional enriching learning opportunities through the curriculum, course and timetable design

Every six months:

school leaders review and refine attendance plan to increase regular attendance

leaders review data, analyse results and progress of overall achievement for all learners and adjust teaching and learning as needed

leaders and the Board review progress towards strategic and annual improvement planning targets, identify areas for improvement plan for the next six months

curriculum leaders and teachers review and evaluate the effectiveness of internal course design and pathways to better support learner outcomes

Annually:

school leaders and the Board review progress in student attendance, using data to identify trends and inform targeted actions and share with the school community

school leaders and the school Board evaluate and refine annual plans and targets, analyse student achievement data and collaboratively develop strategic planning to improve outcomes for all learners

leaders review and refine the teaching observation framework to strengthen consistency and effectiveness of teaching schoolwide for continuous improvement

curriculum leaders and teachers evaluate and enhance courses and pathways to increase learner engagement, develop further opportunities and raise overall achievement.

Expected outcomes

Significantly improved student attendance and achievement towards government targets.

Strengthened leadership with a clear understanding of progress, informed decision-making, and continuous improvement toward achieving strategic goals.

Improved strategic and annual planning, including regular reporting to Board on progress made toward improving student regular attendance and achievement.

Consistent high quality teaching practices that demonstrate a clear focus on improvement, aligned with the Professional Growth Cycle.

A rich and responsive curriculum, with meaningful pathways that promote learner engagement and contribute to improved academic achievement.

Recommendation to the Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the board maintain ongoing support from the Specialist Advisor to effectively address the key improvement priorities identified in this report.

The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Report and is due within four years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Sharon Kelly Director of Schools

15 January 2026

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 4 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).