Hunterville Consolidated School
Full Primary · State
- Year levels
- 1–8
- Total roll
- 107
- Enrolment zone
- No
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 33 Bruce Street, Hunterville
- Territorial authority
- Rangitikei District
- Phone
- 06-3228210
- office@hunterville.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Manawatū-Whanganui
What would the day look like?
The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- How to enrol
- https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fenrolments.linc-ed.com%2Fapply%2FNZ%2F2366&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw2eJbrvfd4fX5CsH70CcpGJ
Parents are able to pre-enrol new students, of any age, at Hunterville School using our [online form.](https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fenrolments.linc-ed.com%2Fapply%2FNZ%2F2366&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw2eJbrvfd4fX5CsH70CcpGJ)
- https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fenrolments.linc-ed.com%2Fapply%2FNZ%2F2366&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw2eJbrvfd4fX5CsH70CcpGJ
What does the school say about itself?
Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- In their words
- At Hunterville School we follow our HERO values of Honesty - Empathy - Respect - Responsibility
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 94
- Māori
- 21
- Pacific
- 7
- Asian
- 2
- MELAA
- 3
- Other
- 0
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Year 02 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Year 03 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Year 04 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Year 05 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Year 06 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Year 07 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 19 |
| Year 08 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| Total | 24 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 103 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Age 06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Age 07 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Age 08 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Age 09 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Age 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Age 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 17 |
| Age 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| Age 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 103 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
53.9%
| Hunterville Consolidated School | 53.9% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 45.5% |
| Full Primary | 35.6% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 116% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 67.6% |
| Total | 53.9% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Hunterville Consolidated School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 6.2% |
| Full Primary | 3.9% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
0%
| Hunterville Consolidated School | 0% |
|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui Region | 2.8% |
| Full Primary | 1.7% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 0% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 0% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 446
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Rural settlement
- Date opened
- 27 September 1887
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 4
- Last reviewed
- 29 November 2024
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (29 November 2024)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The same report — the board assurance report of 29 November 2024 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.
ERO and the board have identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
on the basis of good quality assessment information, the board has not received or reported to the school’s community on the progress and achievement of students as a whole or students who are not progressing or at risk of not progressing, including the progress and achievement of Māori students [Regulation 21 of Education (School Boards) Amendment Regulations 2022]
has documents showing that suitable human resource management practices are implemented. [Section 599 of the Act: Performance of Teachers, Section 600 of the Act: Equal employment opportunities]
The board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.
The roll ERO recorded, and when
ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 107 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.
May 2019
167
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 18 June 2019
November 2014
168
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 4 February 2015
We draw no line between these. Each was counted for its own report, years apart, by a different review team, and a roll moves between reviews for reasons none of these figures record — so the difference between any two of them measures nothing.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 29 November 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Hunterville Consolidated School is a full primary school located in the Rangitikei district and provides education for students in Years 1 to 8. A new principal was appointed in 2023. A new leadership team is also in place. The school’s vision to provide an education that grows with each child is supported through the values of honesty, empathy, respect and responsibility.
There are two parts to this report.
Part A: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.
Part B: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
Outcomes for learners are increasingly excellent and equitable.
Achievement information shows most learners, including Māori , achieve at or above the expected curriculum levels in reading and writing; and a large majority achieve at or above in mathematics.
Improving equity for groups of learners, particularly for male students in writing and mathematics, remains a school priority.
Attendance information shows a majority of students attend school regularly in relation to the Ministry of Education targets; leaders and teachers effectively monitor and support whānau to improve the attendance rates of learners.
Conditions to support learner success
Leaders work collaboratively and strategically to improve outcomes for learners.
Leaders collectively analyse the effectiveness of systems, processes and practices to inform evidence-based changes that respond to learner needs.
Leadership facilitates ongoing improvement and development to strengthen consistent, responsive teaching practices, through targeted professional learning.
Leaders and staff promote a positive, inclusive school culture with a clear focus on improving learner attendance, wellbeing and engagement in learning.
Teachers are establishing responsive teaching and learning practices that are consistent and cohesive across the school.
Learners needing additional support are identified and provided with increasingly effective assistance to progress their learning.
Teachers are strengthening capability in using data to inform responsive practices that support improved learner outcomes and address barriers to learning.
Learners are supported to engage, inquire and apply new learning within an inclusive, positive learning environment.
Key conditions to build and sustain improved outcomes for learners are strengthening.
Leaders and teachers are strengthening the use of information from a range of sources to plan for ongoing improvement.
The board and leaders are building and aligning schoolwide planning, assessment and reporting practices focused on learner wellbeing, engagement and achievement.
The board, leaders and staff continue to strengthen partnerships with whānau and the wider community, including iwi and hapū ; their views are actively sought to guide ongoing improvement and development of local curriculum.
Leaders continue to support teachers to build confidence and capability in te reo Māori and te ao Māori to improve learning opportunities for all students.
Part B: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
strengthen use of achievement information to inform responsive teaching practices and improve achievement outcomes for all learners, particularly for males in writing and mathematics
further develop partnerships with whānau and the wider community, including local iwi and hapū , using the skills and knowledge they bring to build on current practice and learning programmes
integrate quality te reo Māori and te ao Māori learning opportunities throughout the curriculum.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows:
Within six months:
use assessment information to critically review teaching programmes that support greater consistency and purposefully address barriers to learner progress and achievement, particularly in writing and mathematics
use a framework, such as Poutama Reo, to evaluate current teacher practice and collect baseline data for improving te reo Māori and te ao Māori use within the classroom
Every six months:
moderate and monitor the progress and achievement of all learners, and use this information to inquire and adapt teaching practices to improve learner outcomes
continue to work alongside whānau, iwi and hapū to engage and share aspirations for all learners and to sustain active participation in the planning and decision-making of the school
leaders to monitor how well teachers are increasingly integrating quality te reo Māori and te ao Māori throughout the implementation of the curriculum
Annually:
analyse and report schoolwide attendance, progress and achievement data to the school board to strategically plan actions that will improve outcomes for all learners
gather and review whānau, iwi and hapū voice on the success of partnerships with the school, to assist with strengthening responsive practices to further engage learners with the local curriculum
leaders to evaluate the impact of identified initiatives that have been most successful in accelerating learner progress and achievement, with a focus on informing next steps, including the effective integration of te reo Māori and te ao Māori.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
consistent, effective and responsive teaching, learning and assessment practices schoolwide, resulting in improved equity of outcomes for all learners
improved and sustained levels of engagement between the school and its community, including iwi and hapū , that contribute to the depth and breadth of teaching and learning programmes
successful and effective integration of te ao Māori through all aspects of teaching and learning, with students and staff regularly using te reo Māori with increased capability.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Shelley Booysen Director of Schools
29 November 2024
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 4 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).