KuraHub

← Back to search

Ferguson Intermediate (Otara)

Intermediate · State

Year levels
7–8
Total roll
381
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 569 schools in Auckland Region with a published location. Ferguson Intermediate (Otara) is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
Ferguson Road, Otara, Auckland
Territorial authority
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board Area
Phone
09-2748471
Email
office@fergusonint.school.nz
Website
http://fergusonint.school.nz/
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Auckland

What would the day look like?

The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.

What does the school say about itself?

Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.

Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.

In their words
    • SafetyResponsibilityRespectResilience

Check it on the school’s own website →

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
13
Māori
82
Pacific
305
Asian
27
MELAA
3
Other
3
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 07461821032120214
Year 08441622014100205
Total903443046220419
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 113913171190157
Age 12411691833100207
Age 1310435013053
Age 1401001002
Total903443046220419

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

28.1%

Ferguson Intermediate (Otara)28.1%
Auckland Region29.7%
Intermediate43.3%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female10.5%
Male43.6%
Māori102.4%
Pacific22.1%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total28.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

4.1%

Ferguson Intermediate (Otara)4.1%
Auckland Region3%
Intermediate4.9%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male7.7%
Māori23.4%
Pacific2.5%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total4.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

2.1%

Ferguson Intermediate (Otara)2.1%
Auckland Region1.4%
Intermediate1.9%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male4%
Māori12.3%
Pacific2.6%
Asian0%
Other0%
European/Pākehā0%
Total2.1%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
519
Boarding
No
Language of instruction
Some students taught in te reo Māori or a Pacific language
Urban / rural
Major urban area
Date opened
25 January 1970

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
3
Last reviewed
5 February 2026
Latest report
School Report
Report type
Review report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (11 December 2023)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 11 December 2023 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

What this report states about the school

As stated in ERO’s report of 5 February 2026 — not necessarily the position now. Each line quotes the sentence it came from.

Year levels
  • Years 7 and 8provides education for students in Years 7 and 8
Bilingual or immersion provision
  • Two bilingual units: Te Piringa Reo (te reo Māori bilingual learning) and Fotua’I Mo Lou Lumana’i (Samoan bilingual learning)The school includes two bilingual units: Te Piringa Reo provides te reo Māori bilingual learning; Fotua’I Mo Lou Lumana’i provides Samoan bilingual learning.

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 5 February 2026 — “School Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

School Report

Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.

We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.

Every New Zealand state and state integrated school has an ERO review at least once every four years to evaluate what is working well for learners and what needs to be improved.

About the School

Ferguson Intermediate in Ōtara , South Auckland provides education for students in Years 7 and 8. The roll is 420; 82% of students identify as Pacific heritage, 19% as Māori and 9% as Asian. The school’s vision of Excellence through working as one is supported by the values of Mana | Respect, Haumarutanga | Safety, Haepapatanga | Responsibility and Manawaroa | Resilience.

The school includes two bilingual units: Te Piringa Reo provides te reo Māori bilingual learning; Fotua’I Mo Lou Lumana’i provides Samoan bilingual learning.

A Limited Statutory Manager (LSM) has been working with the school since September 2025.

Education Counts provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement, school enrolments and school zones. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

An explanation of the terms and judgements used in this report can be found here: Reporting | Education Review Office

Improvement and progress

This section is about the progress the school has made since the December 2023 ERO report. It includes an explanation of the expected improvements and findings.

Expected improvements

The school evaluated how effectively leaders and teachers used achievement and engagement information to implement strategies that accelerate the progress and achievement of all learners.

The school expected to see teachers consistently use engagement and achievement data to respond to learning needs and support accelerated progress and achievement. They also expected to see strong learning-focused partnerships between learners, teachers and families/ whānau.

Findings

The school made some progress in strengthening partnerships between learners, teachers and families/ whānau.

Leaders and teachers are yet to consistently gather, analyse and use engagement and achievement information to inform planning and accelerate student progress. ERO was unable to verify the extent to which student outcomes have improved since the previous ERO report.

What we know about learner success

This section provides a summary of learner success and wellbeing. The judgments are based on the ERO School Improvement Framework and the evidence provided to ERO during the evaluation.

Achievement in Years 7 to 8

This section is about learner achievement. It outlines how well learners across the school meet or exceed the expected curriculum level of The New Zealand Curriculum in foundational skills.

Less than a third Less than half Small majority Large majority Most Almost all

0 to 33% 34 to 49% 50 to 65% 65 to 79% 80 to 90% Over 90%

Reading ERO was unable to verify the extent to which learners meet or exceed the expected curriculum level.

Writing ERO was unable to verify the extent to which learners meet or exceed the expected curriculum level.

Mathematics ERO was unable to verify the extent to which learners meet or exceed the expected curriculum level.

Attendance

This section is about school attendance and the progress the school is making towards meeting the Government target of 80% regular attendance.

Less than half of learners attend school regularly.

The school is behind the target of 80% regular attendance.

The school is developing a suitable plan to improve attendance.

Regular attendance is improving towards or beyond the target.

Chronic absence is reducing over time .

Assessment

This section is about how the school assesses learner progress and achievement.

The school is not yet using an appropriate approach or reliable practices to accurately find out about achievement against the curriculum.

Teachers should improve their use of assessment information to adjust teaching practices to ensure ongoing improvement in teaching and student progress.

Progress

This section is about how well the school supports all learners to make sufficient progress.

School leadership was unable to provide ERO with an analysis of schoolwide achievement information over time to show the extent to which learners have made progress in reading, writing and mathematics.

The school is developing good quality planning to increase the rate of progress for all groups of students.

The school is unable to identify if they are making progress towards meeting Government reading, writing and mathematics targets and/or pānui, tuhituhi and pāngarau targets for 2030 and agrees this will need to be a key strategic priority.

Next steps for improvement

This section provides more detail for the school to include in its strategic and annual planning for ongoing improvement across the school. It outlines what the school is doing well and identifies actions for improvement.

Areas of Strength

Learners express an appreciation and pride for their school and community that supports their sense of belonging. They speak positively about a school environment that values their language, culture and identity.

A committed staff foster calm and settled learning environments that enable learners to experience positive relationships with their teachers.

Teachers know their learners well. Collaborative planning supports shared approaches, resulting in teaching that promotes positive classroom experiences.

Learners have opportunities to learn skills and knowledge that extend beyond the school gates with involvement in different external events and competitions.

The school develops strong community partnerships and close connections to local cultural and community groups. The school Board reflects the school community and is highly visible and accessible.

Key priorities

Improve and accelerate student progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics.

Embed structured approaches to the teaching of literacy and mathematics.

Develop clear, cohesive schoolwide internal evaluation systems and assessment practices to ensure reliable progress and achievement data.

Improve the collection, analysis and use of assessment data to inform quality teaching and learning, strategic planning and improvement priorities.

Improve regular attendance and reduce chronic absences.

Actions to bring about improvement

These actions will be supported through collaboration with the Limited Statutory Manager to ensure sustainable improvement and effective governance oversight.

Within three months:

the principal and senior leadership team establish clarity and cohesion around their leadership approach to support a consistent improvement-focused culture

leaders strengthen their data literacy skills to develop collective understanding that informs reporting and ongoing improvement

leaders develop a robust schoolwide internal evaluation framework to guide improvement planning

leaders implement and monitor the attendance action plan to inform next steps

Within six months:

leaders and teachers formalise schoolwide expectations for curriculum planning, assessment and delivery

leaders identify teachers’ strengths and development needs and provide professional learning where required

the Board, leaders and teachers build shared understanding and implement systems for internal evaluation that improve learner engagement, progress and achievement

Every six months:

leaders and teachers review the consistency of teaching, learning and assessment practices in literacy and mathematics, and the impact on progress and achievement to inform planning and next steps

leaders review and report to the Board on analysed student progress and achievement information to identify further actions

leaders and teachers review the implementation and impact of internal evaluation on learner progress and achievement outcomes

leaders monitor and report to the Board on the impact of strategies to improve regular attendance for all learners, identify next steps and share with the community

Annually:

the Board and leaders review and refine systems supporting internal evaluation at every level of the school to bring about improvement

the Board and leaders review attendance, progress and achievement data for all learners to inform ongoing strategic planning and decision making.

Expected outcomes

Accelerated progress and achievement outcomes for all learners in reading, writing and mathematics.

Consistent teaching, learning and assessment practices embedded schoolwide.

Embedded systems and processes for internal evaluation that support ongoing and continuous improvement.

Improved rates of regular attendance for all learners.

Regulatory and Legislative Requirements

This section of the report is about how the school meets regulatory and legislative requirements.

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements

This section of the report reviews the school's policies, procedures, documentation, and checks that it meets all regulations, maintains a safe environment, and supports students' wellbeing.

During this review the Board has attested to meeting regulatory and legislative requirements in the following areas:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Actions for Compliance

ERO has identified the following area for improvement:

the Board and principal follow the documented policy and procedures for dealing with complaints to adequately support complainants and the school to reach satisfactory resolution of complaints.

ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:

the Board must obtain Police vets of non-teaching and unregistered employees and contractors in accordance with the requirements of Schedule 4 [s104 Education and Training Act 2020]

every safety check of a person must comply with the requirements for safety checks for core workers or for non-core workers (as appropriate) prescribed by this section and by regulations made under section 32 [s31 Children’s Act 2014]

ensure that an adequate number of workers are trained to administer first aid at the workplace. [s13(2) Health and Safety at Work (General Risk and Workplace Management) Regulations 2016]

The board has since addressed the areas of non-compliance identified.

Recommendation to the Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry of Education maintain ongoing support from the Limited Statutory Manager to effectively address the areas for improvement identified in this report. Priorities include:

accelerating student progress and achievement

developing clear, consistent assessment systems and practices

improving the collection, analysis and use of achievement data.

The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Report and is due within four years.

Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children

Sharon Kelly Director of Schools

5 February 2026

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 3 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).