Dargaville High School
Secondary (Year 9-15) · State
- Year levels
- 9–13
- Total roll
- 406
- Enrolment zone
- No
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- Plunket Street, Dargaville
- Territorial authority
- Kaipara District
- Phone
- 09-4397229
- office@darghigh.school.nz
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Northland
What would the day look like?
The practical things this school states on its own website — the hours, the uniform, the term dates, and how children get there. These are the school’s own words, not the Ministry’s record and not ERO’s.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- School day ends
- 3:10 pm
Home Time | 3:10 pm
- 3:10 pm
- Uniform
- Required
Your uniform is your identity with the school. It needs to be worn presentably and that means clean and tidy.
- Required
What does the school say about itself?
Quoted, not summarised. Every school describes itself well, so this is here to be read as the school’s own case rather than as a finding — and a school that states nothing simply has no row.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- In their words
- Realising potential, recognising and fostering success for each student, developing well rounded, contributing members of society.
- International students
- Accepted, as stated
Requirements and conditions for International Students enrolling at Dargaville High School:
- Accepted, as stated
What is on offer beyond the classroom?
The sports, arts, clubs and groups this school names on its own website. Not a complete list of what any school offers, and not a count — a school that names more here has written more down, which is not the same as doing more.
Quoted from this school’s own website, as we read it on 13 August 2026. A web page carries no date of its own, so that is the day we read it — not a statement that any of this is still the case. Each line quotes the words it came from.
- On offer
- rugby
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- netball
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- soccer
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- swimming
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- athletics
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- cross-country
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- equestrian
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- basketball
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- cricket
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- volleyball
Competition teams represent the school in rugby, netball, soccer, swimming, athletics, cross-country, equestrian, basketball, cricket and volleyball.
- rugby
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 219
- Māori
- 214
- Pacific
- 64
- Asian
- 30
- MELAA
- 3
- Other
- 0
- International
- 0
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 09 | 42 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 79 |
| Year 10 | 49 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 87 |
| Year 11 | 49 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 86 |
| Year 12 | 36 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 66 |
| Year 13+ | 24 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 55 |
| Total | 200 | 56 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 227 | 0 | 373 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 13 | 36 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 64 |
| Age 14 | 54 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 92 |
| Age 15 | 41 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 79 |
| Age 16 | 41 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 73 |
| Age 17 | 22 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 49 |
| Age 18 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Age 19+ | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 200 | 56 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 227 | 0 | 373 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Academic results
Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025
75.9%
| Dargaville High School | 75.9% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 82.3% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 88% |
| State: Not integrated | 83.6% |
| New Zealand | 85.2% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 85.7% |
|---|---|
| Male | 64.9% |
| Māori | 70% |
| Pacific | 63.6% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 77.6% |
| Total | 75.9% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025
67.1%
| Dargaville High School | 67.1% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 72.1% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 81% |
| State: Not integrated | 75.4% |
| New Zealand | 77.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 81% |
|---|---|
| Male | 51.4% |
| Māori | 57.5% |
| Pacific | 54.5% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 67.3% |
| Total | 67.1% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025
36.7%
| Dargaville High School | 36.7% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 48.3% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 61.8% |
| State: Not integrated | 55.2% |
| New Zealand | 59% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 47.6% |
|---|---|
| Male | 24.3% |
| Māori | 30% |
| Pacific | 27.3% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 34.7% |
| Total | 36.7% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with VP Award — 2025
8.9%
| Dargaville High School | 8.9% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 16.8% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 15.2% |
| State: Not integrated | 14.4% |
| New Zealand | 14.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 16.7% |
|---|---|
| Male | 0% |
| Māori | 12.5% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 4.1% |
| Total | 8.9% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)
Retention
Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025
75.9%
| Dargaville High School | 75.9% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 72.9% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 83.5% |
| State: Not integrated | 81.4% |
| New Zealand | 83% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 85.7% |
|---|---|
| Male | 64.9% |
| Māori | 72.5% |
| Pacific | 54.5% |
| Asian | Too few to report |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Too few to report |
| European/Pākehā | 79.6% |
| Total | 75.9% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
47.3%
| Dargaville High School | 47.3% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 52% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 35.8% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 36% |
|---|---|
| Male | 55.6% |
| Māori | 70.9% |
| Pacific | 47.3% |
| Asian | 25.3% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 36.8% |
| Total | 47.3% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
13.9%
| Dargaville High School | 13.9% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 6.5% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 4% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 8.9% |
|---|---|
| Male | 17.5% |
| Māori | 20.4% |
| Pacific | 29.5% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 4% |
| Total | 13.9% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
6%
| Dargaville High School | 6% |
|---|---|
| Northland Region | 2.7% |
| Secondary (Year 9-15) | 1.7% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 3.7% |
|---|---|
| Male | 7.6% |
| Māori | 10.2% |
| Pacific | 22.4% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | Not available (source marker: "nd") |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 6% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 515
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Small urban area
- Date opened
- 3 February 1921
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 7
- Last reviewed
- 5 June 2025
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board attested to all areas (5 June 2025)
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The same report — the board assurance report of 5 June 2025 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.
ERO has identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
Ensure the school’s child protection policy is implemented with fidelity, and staff roles and responsibilities are clear and supported by regular child protection training. [Sections 18 and 19 of the Children’s Act 2014: School boards’ child protection policies]
Follow the practice and procedure prescribed for notifying the use physical restraint. [Sections 99, 100 and 101 of the Education and Training Act 2020: limits, rules and use of physical restraint and behaviour management at registered schools; Ministry of Education (Physical Restraint) Rules 2023]
Ensure the school’s Education Outside the Classroom (EOTC) policy is implemented with fidelity, and risk management procedures align with relevant legislation and guidelines. [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015; Education Outside the Classroom (Ministry of Education)]
Ensure satisfactory safety checking of persons employed by the Board, including identity confirmation, police vetting and risk assessments of information collected. [Sections 25, 26 and 27 of the Children’s Act 2014: Safety checks of children’s workers]
Obtain Police vetting for every person before the person’s employment or engagement at the school begins. [Section 104 and Schedule 4 of the Education and Training Act 2020]
Ensure that persons without a practising certificate are not permanently appointed to a teaching position. [Section 92(2) of the Education and Training Act 2020: Restrictions on appointment of teachers]
The board has not yet addressed the areas of non-compliance identified.
The roll ERO recorded, and when
ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 406 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.
September 2017
461
Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 14 November 2017
This is one count taken for one report. It says what the roll was on that day, and nothing about how the roll has moved.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 5 June 2025 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa.
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Dargaville High School is located in the Kaipara District in the Northland Region and provides education for learners in Years 9 to 13. Over half of students are of Māori heritage who predominantly whakapapa to local hapū and Ngāti Whatua iwi.
There are three parts to this report.
Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.
Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki/ bilingual settings.
Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Previous Improvement Goals
Since the November 2022 ERO report the school has been working to strengthen teaching practices in Years 9 and 10 to prepare all ā konga for success. The school expected to see:
The effective use of teaching strategies to raise outcomes for all learners.
A focus on better supporting students with additional learning needs.
Subject areas and departments providing meaningful learning experiences.
The school has made limited progress against these priorities.
Other Findings
During subsequent ERO visits, it was found that there were additional priorities for improvement. The school responded by identifying three key improvement priorities to focus on that impact directly on student outcomes.
School leaders have been working with the Ministry of Education to develop an Action Plan focused on:
raising overall student attendance, retention and achievement with a priority on ākonga Māori
consistent assessment practices, with urgency for teachers of Years 9 and 10
accelerated rates of progress and achievement, particularly for Year 9 and 10 students in literacy and mathematics.
Part B: Current State
ERO undertook a further full onsite review of the school in April 2025. The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
Improvement is required to ensure students are attending regularly, engaged in learning, making sufficient progress and achieving well.
Less than half of students attain National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 1; a large majority of students attain Levels 2 and 3 with few gaining University Entrance; disparity for Māori learners exists across all outcome measures.
A number of students do not stay at school until Year 12 and succeed.
The school is yet to develop a clear understanding about student progress and achievement in literacy and mathematics in Years 9 and 10.
Less than half of students regularly attend school; improving attendance remains an urgent priority.
Conditions to support learner success
Leadership is yet to develop effective systems and processes to improve outcomes for learners.
Leaders are yet to establish organisational conditions to drive strategic improvement and raise student attendance, engagement and achievement.
Leaders have developed a plan of action; ensuring these plans are implemented effectively, with clear and measurable progress outcomes is an urgent priority.
The current school culture does not consistently promote: high expectations the provision of high-quality teaching equity and excellence in learner outcomes.
The quality of teaching is highly variable and needs significant improvement.
Leaders and teachers are at an early stage of using achievement information to inform teaching and learning and accelerate student progress.
The planned curriculum includes learning across the breadth of the New Zealand Curriculum , with the aspirations of whānau , hapū and iwi beginning to be recognised through the delivery of the curriculum.
Teachers recognise the need to promote higher expectations for learning, progress and achievement.
Improvements to school conditions are required to enable improved outcomes for students.
The school is taking some steps to improve students’ engagement, belonging and inclusion; developing school wide systems to better support learners with complex needs to achieve educational goals is a priority.
The school is working towards a whānau based pastoral system in partnership with mana whenua ; the school should enhance communication with parents and whānau to focus on students’ attendance, learning, progress and achievement.
The school board and leaders should implement a planned approach to school improvement, informed by quality evidence and robust internal evaluation and take urgent action to ensure a physically and emotionally safe learning and working environment.
Part C: Where to next? Recommendation
Under section 171 of the Education and Training Act 2020, that a Commissioner be appointed in order to bring about the following improvements:
health and safety and positive school culture
leadership of learning and curriculum
attendance, progress and achievement
strategic and annual planning for improvement
employment.
Next Steps
The school needs to act urgently to:
strengthen school leadership
improve strategic and action and implementation planning to: set and pursue measurable goals and targets for student attendance, engagement achievement, progress and retention align and strengthen school systems, processes and organisational conditions to support these goals decide progress measures against milestones create a reporting framework that provides visibility about the progress being made towards goals
use effective strategies to improve attendance and engagement in learning
develop a school culture committed to high quality teaching and assessment practices.
The required actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.
Within three months:
address all non-compliances, prioritise health and safety concerns, and establish processes to ensure the school meets legislative requirements
implement a robust system for observing teaching and learning based on high quality practice indicators, including relevant feedback and support to improve the quality of teaching
review, clarify and align strategic documents to establish a small number of improvement targets, focused on improving outcomes for learners, including appropriate and timely ways to measure and track progress over time
establish a system for collecting consistent and reliable information about student progress and achievement that can be measured, tracked and monitored over time
Within six months:
evaluate effectiveness of systems and processes for ensuring student safety
evaluate progress of teaching and learning and support systems to inform next steps
develop a shared understanding of roles and responsibilities of teachers and leaders to achieve identified targets for improvement
comprehensively report about student progress to parents and whānau
review school culture, using student perceptions regarding expectations for equity and excellence.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
effective school leadership that drives continuous school improvement
school systems embedded to ensure students are physically and emotionally safe
students consistently experiencing high quality teaching and learning
leaders and teachers working together to meet the school’s goals and targets
outcomes for students improving.
ERO will revisit the school early 2026 to assess progress towards improvement goals and report to the school community within the next 12 months.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Sharon Kelly Director of Schools (Acting)
5 June 2025
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 7 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).