KuraHub

← Back to search

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ

Specialist School · State

Year levels
not reported
Total roll
76
Enrolment zone
No
Gender
Co-Educational
Every one of the 569 schools in Auckland Region with a published location. Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ is the marked one. Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Where is it, and how do I get in touch?

Address
2 McVilly Rd, Manurewa, Auckland
Territorial authority
Manurewa Local Board Area
Phone
09-2667109
Email
info@blennz.school.nz
Website
http://www.blennz.school.nz
Directions
Get directions

Other schools nearby: schools in Auckland

Who goes here?

Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.

European
32
Māori
21
Pacific
29
Asian
16
MELAA
1
Other
0
International
0

Roll by year level and age

Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.

By year level
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Year 0122000203
Year 0222200308
Year 0323100309
Year 0400200002
Year 0522100004
Year 0600100405
Year 0702100104
Year 0812300206
Year 0913100004
Year 1011000001
Year 1103000104
Year 1200000101
Year 13+652007019
Total1725140024070
By age
MāoriPacificAsianMELAAOtherEuropean/ PākehāInternational studentsTotal
Age 0522000203
Age 0632200309
Age 0713100308
Age 0800200002
Age 0922100004
Age 1000100304
Age 1102200206
Age 1213200105
Age 1312100104
Age 1411000001
Age 1503000003
Age 1600100102
Age 1720000304
Age 1822100409
Age 19+23000106
Total1725140024070

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0

Academic results

Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025

62.5%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ62.5%
Auckland Region90.1%
Specialist School12.7%
State: Not integrated83.6%
New Zealand85.2%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificToo few to report
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total62.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025

62.5%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ62.5%
Auckland Region85.3%
Specialist School8%
State: Not integrated75.4%
New Zealand77.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificToo few to report
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total62.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025

25%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ25%
Auckland Region71.7%
Specialist School1.8%
State: Not integrated55.2%
New Zealand59%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificToo few to report
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total25%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)

Percentage with VP Award — 2025

12.5%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ12.5%
Auckland Region14.6%
Specialist School0.7%
State: Not integrated14.4%
New Zealand14.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificToo few to report
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total12.5%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)

Retention

Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025

100%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ100%
Auckland Region88.9%
Specialist School79.1%
State: Not integrated81.4%
New Zealand83%
Trend and demographic breakdown
FemaleToo few to report
MaleToo few to report
MāoriToo few to report
PacificToo few to report
AsianNot applicable
MELAANot applicable
OtherNot applicable
European/PākehāToo few to report
Total100%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)

Student engagement

Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ0%
Auckland Region29.7%
Specialist School24.1%
State40.2%
New Zealand37.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)

Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ0%
Auckland Region3%
Specialist School3.4%
State4.5%
New Zealand4.1%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)

Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024

0%

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ0%
Auckland Region1.4%
Specialist School1.8%
State1.9%
New Zealand1.8%
Trend and demographic breakdown
Female0%
Male0%
Māori0%
Pacific0%
Asian0%
OtherNot available (source marker: "nd")
European/Pākehā0%
Total0%

Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)

About the school

Equity Index (EQI)
480
Boarding
Yes
Language of instruction
All students taught in English/other setting
Urban / rural
Major urban area
Date opened
28 February 1965

The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works

What did ERO find?

The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools

Reports ERO holds
5
Last reviewed
27 July 2023
Latest report
Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report
Report type
Profile report
Board assurance
The board attested to all areas (27 July 2023)

A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.

The board assurance report of 27 July 2023 carries no actions-for-compliance section — the section ERO uses when it names non-compliance it identified. That is what this report contains; it is not ERO saying it found none. Other reports ERO holds for this school may say something different.

The roll ERO recorded, and when

ERO writes a roll into each report it publishes: a count taken for that report, on the day shown, by the review team that was there. The Ministry of Education’s current roll for this school is 76 — the figure at the top of this page, and the one to use for how big the school is now. These are a different measurement by a different body, so they will rarely agree, and a difference between them is not a change in the school.

  1. October 2016

    37

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 18 January 2017

  2. September 2012

    40

    Counted while ERO’s review team was at the school. Education Review Office, report of 27 November 2012

We draw no line between these. Each was counted for its own report, years apart, by a different review team, and a roll moves between reviews for reasons none of these figures record — so the difference between any two of them measures nothing.

What ERO wrote in its latest report

This is ERO’s report of 27 July 2023 — “Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.

Background

This Profile Report was written within 6 months of the Education Review Office and Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ working in Te Ara Huarau , an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website. www.ero.govt.nz

Context

The Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ (BLENNZ) is a national school based in Manurewa , Auckland. It provides a network of education services to blind, deafblind, and low vision ākonga throughout New Zealand from birth to 21 years, including those who have additional learning needs.

As a national school with a wide community, it includes ākonga and their whānau ; Resource Teachers Vision (RTV) and blindness educators; partner service providers, such as Blind Low Vision NZ (aka Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind); and blindness education sector groupings.

Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are:

all BLENNZ staff will demonstrate increased knowledge skills and understanding with regards to bicultural practice

to review and revise the BLENNZ curriculum (Expanded Core Curriculum) ensuring it reflects the intent of the national curriculum refresh, a bicultural inclusive curriculum

to work in collaboration with whānau and the teaching team to further the scope and integration of the BLENNZ curriculum for Orientation and Mobility (O&M) and daily life skills. This will inform and further develop the services for Developmental Orientation and Mobility (DOM) and Life Skills resulting in a holistic approach which leads enhanced outcomes for ākonga .

You can find a copy of the network’s strategic and annual plan on Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ’s website.

ERO and BLENNZ are working together to evaluate how well the revised BLENNZ Expanded Core Curriculum empowers ākonga who are blind, deafblind and low vision to effectively access and participate in Te Whāriki (the Early Childhood Curriculum) and Te Mātaiaho (Refreshing The New Zealand Curriculum ) enabling each learner to reach their full potential.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is to support senior leadership review the BLENNZ Expanded Core Curriculum to ensure it:

is responsive to the intent of Te Mātaiaho

continues to enhance positive learning and wellbeing outcomes for ākonga .

The network expects to see:

enhanced ākonga access and engagement in learning through Te Mātaiaho

ākonga outcomes enriched through a consistently equitable and strengths-based approach to teaching and learning

teacher capability in service delivery of the refreshed Expanded Core Curriculum strengthened through appropriate professional development.

Strengths

The network can draw from the following strengths to support its goal to evaluate how well the revised BLENNZ Expanded Core Curriculum empowers ākonga who are blind, deafblind and low vision, to access and participate in Te Mātaiaho (Refreshing The New Zealand Curriculum ) enabling each learner to reach their full potential:

ākonga experience holistic learning approaches that promote a strong sense of belonging, are culturally responsive and promote self-advocacy

leadership that continually adapts implementation and strategy to deliver on the school’s priorities

leadership that collaboratively sustains a culture of relational trust, to ensure ongoing organisational capacity building for continuous improvement.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

a review of the BLENNZ Expanded Core Curriculum to align with the intention of Te Mātaiaho

professional development to continue to strengthen teacher capability across the network activating and integrating the calls to action within Te Mātaiaho and the BLENNZ Expanded Core Curriculum

review and refinement of the BLENNZ Framework of Indicators, to measure and report on individual and aggregated ākonga outcomes in response to the refreshed curricula.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Shelley Booysen Director of Schools

27 July 2023

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Read this report on ero.govt.nz →

Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →

All 5 reports ERO holds for this school

ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.

Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.

Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).