Akaroa Area School
Composite · State
- Year levels
- not reported
- Total roll
- 115
- Enrolment zone
- No
- Gender
- Co-Educational
Where is it, and how do I get in touch?
- Address
- 141 Rue Jolie, Akaroa
- Territorial authority
- Christchurch City
- Phone
- 03-3047108
- office@akaroa.school.nz
- Website
- http://akaroa.school.nz/
- Directions
- Get directions
Other schools nearby: schools in Christchurch · schools in Canterbury
Who goes here?
Ethnicity breakdown of the total roll, shown as context. Not ranked, and not compared against any average.
- European
- 91
- Māori
- 30
- Pacific
- 7
- Asian
- 14
- MELAA
- 6
- Other
- 0
- International
- 1
Roll by year level and age
Shown as context, not ranked, not compared to any average. As at 30 June 2026, from the same annual return as the roll count above.
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Year 02 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Year 03 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Year 04 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Year 05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Year 06 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Year 07 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 08 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 09 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 11 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Year 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Year 13+ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Total | 24 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 1 | 118 |
| Māori | Pacific | Asian | MELAA | Other | European/ Pākehā | International students | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Age 06 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Age 07 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Age 08 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Age 09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Age 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Age 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Age 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Age 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| Age 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Age 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| Age 16 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| Age 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Age 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Age 19+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 1 | 118 |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0
Academic results
Percentage with NCEA level 1 or above — 2025
100%
| Akaroa Area School | 100% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 87.1% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 91.4% |
| State: Not integrated | 83.6% |
| New Zealand | 85.2% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | Too few to report |
|---|---|
| Male | Too few to report |
| Māori | Too few to report |
| Pacific | Not applicable |
| Asian | Not applicable |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | Too few to report |
| Total | 100% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 1 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 2 or above — 2025
100%
| Akaroa Area School | 100% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 79.6% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 86% |
| State: Not integrated | 75.4% |
| New Zealand | 77.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | Too few to report |
|---|---|
| Male | Too few to report |
| Māori | Too few to report |
| Pacific | Not applicable |
| Asian | Not applicable |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | Too few to report |
| Total | 100% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 2 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with NCEA level 3 or above — 2025
71.4%
| Akaroa Area School | 71.4% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 59% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 71.7% |
| State: Not integrated | 55.2% |
| New Zealand | 59% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | Too few to report |
|---|---|
| Male | Too few to report |
| Māori | Too few to report |
| Pacific | Not applicable |
| Asian | Not applicable |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | Too few to report |
| Total | 71.4% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison NCEA level 3 data (2023-2025)
Percentage with VP Award — 2025
14.3%
| Akaroa Area School | 14.3% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 13.7% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 16% |
| State: Not integrated | 14.4% |
| New Zealand | 14.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | Too few to report |
|---|---|
| Male | Too few to report |
| Māori | Too few to report |
| Pacific | Not applicable |
| Asian | Not applicable |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | Too few to report |
| Total | 14.3% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison Vocational Pathway data (2023-2025)
Retention
Percentage staying until at least 17th birthday — 2025
100%
| Akaroa Area School | 100% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 83.6% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 86.6% |
| State: Not integrated | 81.4% |
| New Zealand | 83% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | Too few to report |
|---|---|
| Male | Too few to report |
| Māori | Too few to report |
| Pacific | Not applicable |
| Asian | Not applicable |
| MELAA | Not applicable |
| Other | Not applicable |
| European/Pākehā | Too few to report |
| Total | 100% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison trend data (2023-2025)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
— 2024
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 1: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education one year after leaving school (2022-2024 leaver cohorts)
— 2023
not reported
| Female | not reported |
|---|---|
| Male | not reported |
| Māori | not reported |
| Pacific | not reported |
| Asian | not reported |
| MELAA | not reported |
| Other | not reported |
| European/Pākehā | not reported |
| Total | not reported |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: School leavers enrolled in tertiary education two years after leaving school (2021-2023 leaver cohorts)
Student engagement
Age-standardised stand-down rate per 1,000 students — 2024
81.7%
| Akaroa Area School | 81.7% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 38.3% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 26.5% |
| State | 40.2% |
| New Zealand | 37.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 147.6% |
| Māori | 143.4% |
| Pacific | 91.5% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 63.7% |
| Total | 81.7% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison stand-down rates data (2024)
Age-standardised suspension rate per 1,000 students — 2024
23.3%
| Akaroa Area School | 23.3% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 3.7% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 3.2% |
| State | 4.5% |
| New Zealand | 4.1% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 42.3% |
| Māori | 18.9% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 19.8% |
| Total | 23.3% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison suspension rates data (2024)
Age-standardised exclusion rate per 1,000 students — 2024
6.6%
| Akaroa Area School | 6.6% |
|---|---|
| Canterbury Region | 1.7% |
| Composite (Year 1-15) | 1.2% |
| State | 1.9% |
| New Zealand | 1.8% |
Trend and demographic breakdown
| Female | 0% |
|---|---|
| Male | 12.3% |
| Māori | 20.9% |
| Pacific | 0% |
| Asian | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| European/Pākehā | 0% |
| Total | 6.6% |
Source: Education Counts, Ministry of Education, CC BY 4.0 — Table 2: Comparison exclusion data (2024)
About the school
- Equity Index (EQI)
- 455
- Boarding
- No
- Language of instruction
- All students taught in English/other setting
- Urban / rural
- Rural settlement
- Date opened
- 29 September 1881
The Equity Index is used by the Ministry to allocate equity funding. It describes the socio-economic barriers a school’s students face, not how good the school is. How the Equity Index works
What did ERO find?
The Education Review Office reviews every school and publishes what it finds in full. We quote ERO’s report here, section by section, in ERO’s own words and order, and link to it. We do not summarise a report, pick a line out of one, or turn one into a score. How ERO reviews schools
- Reports ERO holds
- 6
- Last reviewed
- 12 December 2024
- Latest report
- School Evaluation Report
- Report type
- Evaluation report
- Board assurance
- The board did not attest to all areas (12 December 2024)
Areas the board did not attest to, in ERO’s words: Assets. The report says what that meant and what happened next.
A board assurance statement is the board’s own account of whether it took all reasonable steps to meet its legal obligations, on the date shown. It is not ERO’s finding. ERO reports separately, in the same report, on any non-compliance it identified during that process.
The same report — the board assurance report of 12 December 2024 — also sets out actions for compliance: the non-compliance ERO identified during that process. This is that section of the report in full, in ERO’s words.
ERO and the board have identified the following areas of non-compliance during the board assurance process:
Be satisfied that student absences are correctly recorded, monitored and followed up [Section 36, Education and Training Act 2020; Regulations 3/11 Education (School Attendance) Regulations 1951]
Students in Year 7 and above must be provided with appropriate career education and guidance [Section 103, Education and Training Act 2020]
Work towards offering students in Years 7 to 10 opportunities for learning second or subsequent languages [The New Zealand Curriculum]
Comply with the code for the use of hazardous substances for the teaching of science and technology. [Code of Practice for School Exempt Laboratories 2015]
Comply with the code of practice for the pastoral care of international students [Education Pastoral Care of Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice 2021]
Ensure that every contractor or independent person who provides children’s services adopts and reviews a child protection policy [Section 15 Oranga Tamariki Act 1989; Sections 18-19 and Part 6 Children’s Act 2014]
Undertaken compliant safety checks for contractors likely to have unsupervised access to children [Sections 25, 16, 27 Children’s Act 2014; Regulations 5-8 Children's (Requirements for Safety Checks of Children’s Workers) Regulations 2015; Section 104 Education and Training Act 2020]
Comply with the conditions under which students undertake work experience and health and safety responsibilities [Section 53 Education and Training Act 2020; Health and Safety at Work Act 2015]
The Board must receive monthly reports on monitoring, maintenance and hazards, and be satisfied with compliance. [Health and Safety at Work Act 2015; Health and Safety at Work (General Risk and Workplace Management) Regulations 2016; Clause 17 Property Occupancy Document]
Develop an emergency plan [National Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan Order 2015]
Review evacuation procedures scheme and be satisfied with compliance, receive assurance of trial evacuations at intervals of not more than six months [Fire Safety, Evacuation Procedures, and Evacuation Schemes Regulations 2018; Clause 20 Property Occupancy Document]
The board has since taken steps to address the areas of non-compliance identified.
What ERO wrote in its latest report
This is ERO’s report of 12 December 2024 — “School Evaluation Report” — section by section, under ERO’s own headings, in ERO’s own order. Nothing is summarised, shortened or reordered.
School Evaluation Report
Tēnā koutou e mau manawa rahi ki te kaupapa e aro ake nei, ko te tamaiti te pūtake o te kaupapa. Mā wai rā e kawe, mā tātau katoa .
We acknowledge the collective effort, responsibility and commitment by all to ensure that the child remains at the heart of the matter.
Context
Akaroa Area School, located on Banks Peninsula in Canterbury, provides education for learners in Years 1 to 13. The school’s vision is Kotahitanga , embrace the future . The school values are Respect, Integrity, Perseverance and Pride . Since the previous ERO review, a new principal has been appointed.
There are three parts to this report.
Part A: A summary of the findings from the most recent Education Review Office (ERO) report and/or subsequent evaluation.
Part B: An evaluative summary of learner success and school conditions to inform the school board’s future strategic direction, including any education in Rumaki /bilingual settings.
Part C: The improvement actions prioritised for the school’s next evaluation cycle.
Part A: Previous Improvement Goals
Since the previous ERO report of June 2023, ERO and the school have worked together to evaluate the impact of the changed curriculum on improving student engagement and achievement across the school, from Years 1 to 13.
Expected Improvements and Findings
The school expected to see:
Increased student engagement and achievement.
The school is yet to determine the impact of the changed curriculum on improving student engagement and achievement across the school.
Students have begun leading conferences with their caregivers to discuss their learning, and their ideas are increasingly utilised to help inform change.
Leaders have taken steps to examine and respond to student data to inform curriculum planning to improve achievement.
A responsive curriculum weaving iwi history, location, environment, community, and values into an aligned Years 1 to 13 teaching and learning programme.
Limited progress has been made in developing an aligned Years 1 to 13 curriculum.
An aligned teaching and learning programme in mathematics is under development and will be used as a model across other curriculum areas.
Work is ongoing to strengthen knowledge and understanding of iwi history along with connections to the community.
Shared understandings and expectations about quality teaching knowledge, practices, and processes.
There is a more cohesive understanding of quality teaching practice; this includes the development of a teacher profile and staff code of conduct.
The quality of teaching practices is variable; leaders and teachers’ participation in ongoing professional development and professional learning groups is strengthening teaching practices.
Clarity of valued outcomes for each student, including cultural, academic, social, wellbeing, and leadership.
A learner profile, reflective of student, whānau and teacher feedback has been developed identifying desired skills and outcomes for students; leaders and teachers are taking steps to incorporate this into strategies for positive behaviour.
The development of cultural and leadership opportunities for students is ongoing.
Part B: Current State
The following findings are to inform the school’s future priorities for improvement.
Learner Success and Wellbeing
Improvements are required to ensure all learners are engaged, make sufficient progress and achieve equitable outcomes.
Most students in Years 1 to 10 are achieving at or above expected curriculum levels in reading and writing, a large majority are meeting expected standards in mathematics; significant disparities have been identified for Years 1 to 10 Māori students and boys’ achievement in reading, writing and mathematics.
Most students achieve Level one of the National Certificate in Educational Achievement (NCEA), almost all students achieve Levels two and three and University Entrance.
Students express a strong sense of belonging to their school; greater consistency of teacher expectations and behaviour management is required.
The school is yet to achieve the Ministry of Education’s regular attendance target; the board is unsure of the accuracy of attendance data and leaders have prioritised improvement of attendance systems.
Conditions to support learner success
Leaders are taking steps to establish a cohesive and collaborative school culture.
School leaders are implementing shared understandings for how to work together effectively as a leadership team to facilitate growth and lead change.
Leadership is beginning to establish consistent frameworks with all staff for curriculum, analysis of data and the development of a positive culture for student learning.
School leaders continue to foster and grow connections and partnerships with the wider community and local iwi to enhance learning opportunities.
Teachers, alongside teacher aides, increasingly collaborate to strengthen consistent and responsive teaching practice.
Teaching and support staff are developing agreed and cohesive processes for recognising and reinforcing positive behaviour in all students; this is improving the consistency of expectations that students’ experience.
Leaders have introduced a coaching model to strengthen teachers’ inquiry into the impact of their practice on improving student engagement, achievement and attendance.
Students with additional needs are identified by leaders and teachers and steps are being taken to better address and support their learning and progress.
Leaders and the board are taking well-considered steps in establishing school conditions that enhance student success.
The board is focusing on school improvement through developing systematic review and strategic use of resources.
Improving data collection and analysis by the board, leaders and teachers is strengthening decision making and planning.
External expertise is being accessed by the board and utilised effectively to support improvement; this is strengthening evaluative capability.
Intentional steps taken by leaders and teachers to develop professional networks and collaborate with external agencies are enhancing student engagement, progress, achievement and school culture.
Part C: Where to next?
The agreed next steps for the school are to:
review policies and practices to strengthen compliance with legislation and regulations
use focused coaching to develop and strengthen consistent, high-quality teaching practice, within a clearly aligned Years 1 to 13 curriculum, to improve equity of student achievement
prioritise wellbeing and the positive management of relationships and behaviour across the school to improve student engagement and rates of attendance.
The agreed actions for the next improvement cycle and timeframes are as follows.
Within six months:
complete a Health and Safety audit and act on any recommendations
review and confirm the school’s mission, values and strategic goals to inform expectations for the curriculum design
consolidate and embed the teacher and learner profiles in practice to strengthen the consistent use of these for teaching and learning
continue responding to recent wellbeing surveys and implement consistent behaviour management strategies across the school.
Every six months:
use appropriate student attendance, progress and achievement information to determine the impact of teaching practices on the equity of student progress and achievement and plan for future development
undertake wellbeing surveys of students and staff to review the consistency and effectiveness of behaviour management and use findings to refine approaches going forward
Evaluate the impact and effectiveness of coaching processes on developing high quality teaching practices to lift student achievement.
Annually:
review and respond to progress towards strategic and annual priorities, and report to the board to inform ongoing decision making for improvement
evaluate professional support and development for teachers and plan for future development
consider and respond to the wellbeing needs of students and staff.
Actions taken against these next steps are expected to result in:
improved wellbeing, positive behaviour, engagement and equitable progress and achievement for all students
consistent, positive teaching practices within an aligned Years 1 to 13 curriculum
increased progress towards the Ministry of Education’s target for regular attendance.
Recommendation to the Ministry of Education
ERO recommends that the Ministry of Education provide tailored support for:
developing consistent, high quality teaching practice and effective use of achievement information.
ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.
Me mahi tahi tonu tātau, kia whai oranga a tātau tamariki Let’s continue to work together for the greater good of all children
Shelley Booysen Director of Schools
12 December 2024
About the School
The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home
Read the full report on ero.govt.nz →
All 6 reports ERO holds for this school
ERO reviews a school every few years — around four years between reviews is the usual cycle — so an older date here reflects where a school sits in that cycle, not how it is doing.
Source: Education Review Office, CC BY 4.0.
Roll date: 30 June 2026 (2026).